2006
DOI: 10.1080/02640410500244507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the variability in cortical activation during physical air-rifle shooting and three different observation conditions. Elite air-rifle shooters performed a 40 shot individual match. Electroencephalograms were recorded from 11 active sites across the cortex during the final 6 s (3 6 2 s epochs) before shot release. Data collection was repeated while shooters watched a large-screen video of their worst shot performance from an internal-visual perspective when seated, stand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power values of the included studies to detect the combined effect size for execution ranged from 0.14 for the study with the smallest sample size ( N = 3; Pfurtscheller & Neuper, 1992) to 0.88 for the study with the largest sample size ( N = 39; Woodruff, Martin, & Bilyk, 2011). For observation, the power values ranged from 0.16 for the study with the smallest sample size ( N = 6; Holmes, Collins, & Calmels, 2006) to 0.61 for the study with the largest sample size ( N = 40; Cochin, Barthélémy, Lejeune, Roux, & Martineau, 1998). Certainly for EEG studies on observation, larger sample sizes are needed to detect the expected modest effect sizes and to create a cumulative science (Hulley, Cummings, Browner, Grady, & Newman, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power values of the included studies to detect the combined effect size for execution ranged from 0.14 for the study with the smallest sample size ( N = 3; Pfurtscheller & Neuper, 1992) to 0.88 for the study with the largest sample size ( N = 39; Woodruff, Martin, & Bilyk, 2011). For observation, the power values ranged from 0.16 for the study with the smallest sample size ( N = 6; Holmes, Collins, & Calmels, 2006) to 0.61 for the study with the largest sample size ( N = 40; Cochin, Barthélémy, Lejeune, Roux, & Martineau, 1998). Certainly for EEG studies on observation, larger sample sizes are needed to detect the expected modest effect sizes and to create a cumulative science (Hulley, Cummings, Browner, Grady, & Newman, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence spanning a range of action domains (e.g., karate, air rifle, music) has shown expertise effects on mu and/or beta rhythms during the execution or observation of actions within one's domain of expertise [35], [36][37]. Along the lines of the expert/novice fMRI work described above, EEG reactivity has also been explored in experts (e.g., expert dancers and non-dancers) [34], as well as in participants who received training on a short time scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first studies to provide indirect evidence to support this idea and, at the same time, the behavioural modification hypothesis predicted by the PETTLEP model, was presented by Holmes, Collins, and Calmels (2006). In this PETTLEP-based study, elite air rifle shooters' EEG activity was recorded during competitive shooting as well as during three different conditions of action observation.…”
Section: Progress Of and Prospects For Research On The Pettlep Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%