2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrode potentials of partially reduced oxygen species, from dioxygen to water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
260
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
6
260
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These compounds are often referred to as reactive oxygen species (ROS), although only the hydroxyl radical is indiscriminately reactive and able to initiate a wide variety of radical oxidations by radical addition to, or hydrogen abstraction from biomolecules [2]. Phospholipids, especially those containing di-unsaturated or polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), are primary targets of attack by hydroxyl radicals or other downstream radicals, and are modified to a wide variety of oxidized products in a process called lipid peroxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These compounds are often referred to as reactive oxygen species (ROS), although only the hydroxyl radical is indiscriminately reactive and able to initiate a wide variety of radical oxidations by radical addition to, or hydrogen abstraction from biomolecules [2]. Phospholipids, especially those containing di-unsaturated or polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), are primary targets of attack by hydroxyl radicals or other downstream radicals, and are modified to a wide variety of oxidized products in a process called lipid peroxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 O 2 is a strong oxidant with standard reduction potential of E h = 1.52 V [22]. It is usually produced by photocatalytic activation of dissolved oxygen on metal oxides such as TiO 2 and ZnO [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be ascribed to more selectivity and less oxidative ability of 1 O 2 generated in the DO process. 46 In this regard, the DO process has not maximized the quality of the simulated treated dye wastewater (i.e., CV solution), in terms of TOC, and in practice this could result in failure to satisfy discharge standards. Although the •OH radicals generated in the PC process promote the degradation of a wide range of contaminants efficiently, 2 dye Considering the incomplete degradation/mineralization achieved by the DO and PC processes individually, the efficiency of treating a CV solution (130 mg/L) by the sequential use of DO (10 min) and then PC (20 min) processes was conducted to investigate the combined effect on TOC and color removal performance.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%