2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Study of the Energetics of the Oxygen Evolution Reaction at Nickel Iron (Oxy)Hydroxide Catalysts

Abstract: Iron-doped nickel (oxy)hydroxide catalysts (Fe x Ni 1−x OOH) exhibit high electrocatalytic behavior for the oxygen evolution reaction in base. Recent findings suggest that the incorporation of Fe 3+ into a NiOOH lattice leads to nearly optimal adsorption energies for OER intermediates on active Fe sites. Utilizing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and activation energy measurements, we find that pure NiOOH and FeOOH catalysts exhibit exceedingly high Faradaic resistances and activation energies 40−50 kJ/m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
255
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
28
255
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with this activation process, a redox peak at 1.38 V showed up (Figure 4b) indicating that the active species is most likely γ−NiOOH which can be easily converted from β−NiOOH under concentrated alkaline solution. [35,51,55] It is well known that the iron impurity from the bulk solution can greatly enhance the performance of a nickel-based OER catalyst, [15,[56][57][58] however, the redox peak at 1.38 V is in a good agreement with the oxidation of Ni(OH) 2 to NiOOH, [42,51,55] instead of Ni-Fe double hydroxides (E ox ≈ 1.45 V under the identical conditions). [41,42] Moreover, as shown in Figure 3 (after activation), a slight shift toward higher binding energy and an asymmetry of the main peak that could confirm the transition to NiOOH, [59] and no metallic Ni or alloy such as Ni-Fe is detected on these spectra ( Figure S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201600516mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Along with this activation process, a redox peak at 1.38 V showed up (Figure 4b) indicating that the active species is most likely γ−NiOOH which can be easily converted from β−NiOOH under concentrated alkaline solution. [35,51,55] It is well known that the iron impurity from the bulk solution can greatly enhance the performance of a nickel-based OER catalyst, [15,[56][57][58] however, the redox peak at 1.38 V is in a good agreement with the oxidation of Ni(OH) 2 to NiOOH, [42,51,55] instead of Ni-Fe double hydroxides (E ox ≈ 1.45 V under the identical conditions). [41,42] Moreover, as shown in Figure 3 (after activation), a slight shift toward higher binding energy and an asymmetry of the main peak that could confirm the transition to NiOOH, [59] and no metallic Ni or alloy such as Ni-Fe is detected on these spectra ( Figure S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201600516mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[40,66,67,69,[71][72][73][74][75] Among them, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) has widely been used because it can provide information about the oxidation states and local structure of transition metal ions under OER conditions. [40,69,71,75] Görlin et al performed a kinetic study of Ni-Fe LDH under OER conditions based on quantitative analysis of in situ differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) and XAS.…”
Section: Ni-fe Layered Hydroxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,45 The high frequency resistive response, Re, (Figure 4d). 41 This is a reasonable assumption because the applied potential during EIS measurement was relatively high; hence, the Rp and Rs are replaced with a combined charge transfer resistance, Rct.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%