2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electro-ceramic self-cleaning membranes for biofouling control and prevention in water treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical characteristic XRD pattern of the commercial zeolite Y particles with all major peaks at 12.1°, 15.9°, 20.7°, and 24.1° is displayed in Figure 7 a. These peaks are attributed to the respective planes of (311), (331), (440), and (533), respectively [ 27 ]. Similar peaks are obtained in all the ball-milled samples with different ratios of CNF ( Figure 7 b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical characteristic XRD pattern of the commercial zeolite Y particles with all major peaks at 12.1°, 15.9°, 20.7°, and 24.1° is displayed in Figure 7 a. These peaks are attributed to the respective planes of (311), (331), (440), and (533), respectively [ 27 ]. Similar peaks are obtained in all the ball-milled samples with different ratios of CNF ( Figure 7 b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the methods discussed electrically assisted, vibratory shear‐enhanced cleaning and green solvents have been recently reported. In the electrically enhanced membrane cleaning, an external DC voltage of around 0.5–2 V is applied for short times, enhancing membrane filtration performance and effective fouling mitigation; in the process, negatively charged particles could be driven away by electrostatic force and repelled from the membrane surface (Anis et al, 2021; Li, Su, et al, 2021). For example, by applying a negative charge of 2.0 V on a flat‐sheet conductive ceramic membrane fabricated by coating dopamine and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) onto the surface of α‐alumina membrane support, the fouling rate was reduced by approximately 50% (Li, Su, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Alternative Membrane Cleaning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to improve the antifouling properties, recent studies have also focused on surface modification by the incorporation of nanoparticles (Barati et al, 2021), graphene oxide quantum dots (GOQDs) (Gu et al, 2020), conductive nanozeolite/CNS (Anis et al, 2021), FeOCl coating (Liu, Yao, et al, 2020), enzymes in polymeric micelles (Kolesnyk et al, 2020), and nanofibers (Mao et al, 2022). Usually, the modified membrane shows superior biofouling resistance performance compared with the pristine membrane owing to the hydrophilic property and the stretchable chains on its surface, as observed for composite membrane developed by using commercial membrane material (PVDF) and thermo‐responsive attapulgite (t‐ATP) (Mao et al, 2022).…”
Section: Cleaning Of Modified Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial self-cleaning materials are capable of creating an extremely water repellent surface, where water droplets enable the formation of approximately spherical shapes to pick up and remove bacteria, dust, and even viruses in the process of rolling, which hold great potentials in the remarkable reduction of bacterial adhesion on the substrate surface [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Until now, many examples have demonstrated that self-cleaning surfaces with a contact angle above 90° play vital roles in antifouling and antibacterial applications [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. For instance, in 2022, Narain et al [ 18 ] developed a sugar-responsive and self-cleaning surface with a dual-functional property which not only greatly reduced the bacteria adhesion but also largely promoted the formation of a hydrophilic surface with excellent biocompatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%