1995
DOI: 10.1016/0926-9851(95)90043-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical resistance tomography experiments at the Oregon Graduate Institute

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An air injection well was located just 41 cm from this plane and there is probably some entrained air remaining in the formation near this well. We saw similar long term behavior after an earlier sparging event (Daily et al, 1995).…”
Section: Hz Datasupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An air injection well was located just 41 cm from this plane and there is probably some entrained air remaining in the formation near this well. We saw similar long term behavior after an earlier sparging event (Daily et al, 1995).…”
Section: Hz Datasupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We believe these anomalies are an indirect indicator of the LNAPL (Daily et al, 1995) moving into a soil of heterogeneous permeability. We point out that the LNAPL anomaly in plane L2-L3 is influenced by the small aspect ratio (height./width) of that image plane.…”
Section: Hz Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Street et al [12] used the CBP method to detect seepage from a leaking PVC lined tailings pond. Daily et al [16] evaluated the use of electrical resistance tomography (ERT) to detect a controlled gasoline spill and hydrocarbon leaks from above ground storage tanks. Osiensky [15] simulated CBP measurements to define plume length and center of mass for several hypothetical contaminant plumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this may seem high, expected values can be estimated using the differentiated form of Archic's Law given in Daily et al,, 1995. Initial in situ values of saturation were estimated from the neutron moisture logs that have been calibrated for Hanford soils, Values averaged about 5 % by volume, For an initial resistivity of 2600 ohm-m and a 2 % increase in saturation, the resulting resistivity vnriation is 1040 nhm-m. For the finer sands with an initial resistivity of 200 ohm-m, the estimated resistivity change is 80 ohm-m.…”
Section: Figure2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field testing under various subsurface conditions of the ERT technology has been ongoing by the LLNL developers (Daily et al, 1992 Daily andRamirez, 1993;Daily et al, 1995;Daily and Ramirez, 1995). These tests include monitoring steam flcods and air stripping injection experiments plus conducting water leak tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%