Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2858036.2858488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Egocentric Analysis of Dynamic Networks with EgoLines

Abstract: International audienceThe egocentric analysis of dynamic networks focuses on discovering the temporal patterns of a subnetwork around a specific central actor (i.e., an ego-network). These types of analyses are useful in many application domains, such as social science and business intelligence, providing insights about how the central actor interacts with the outside world. We present EgoLines, an interactive visualization to support the egocentric analysis of dynamic networks. Using a "subway map" metaphor, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has seen increased use in HCI and visualization (e.g. [11,18,35,66,71,74]). We pre-specified all analyses before conducting the experiment and tested on pilot data.…”
Section: S2: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has seen increased use in HCI and visualization (e.g. [11,18,35,66,71,74]). We pre-specified all analyses before conducting the experiment and tested on pilot data.…”
Section: S2: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professional players are embedded into the social structure which is formed by esports arena within which they are discussed, compared, and evaluated in connection with respect to other players and teams. By analysing discussions we uncover mechanisms behind such evaluations using perceived personal networks (Zhao et al 2016;Boyd and Heer 2006;Hâncean, Molina, and Lubbers 2016). We show that some players within the professional Dota 2 community can be considered as exemplars (Dekker 2016).…”
Section: Uncovering Evaluation Mechanisms With Computational Toolsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In cases where the information was not mentioned we estimated the graph sizes from the figures (e.g. [25,27,51,78,100,116,122,123,126,147,150,151]). We also used the hue of the circles to differentiate between static and dynamic graphs.…”
Section: Basic Measures Of Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, all studies that use graphs with ten nodes or more and a density of more than 20% evaluate matrix-like visualisations that scale well for dense graphs [50,77,140,147] or evaluate edgecompression and edge-bundling tools [16,40].…”
Section: Number Of E Dgesmentioning
confidence: 99%