2021
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2020.3027594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient RCS Prediction of the Conducting Target Based on Physics-Inspired Machine Learning and Experimental Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with algorithms in similar literatures or other ML benchmark techniques, the RMSE of the SLICY model is reduced from 36.6% to 66.1%. In Table 3, the mono-RCS prediction capability of the proposed method for a single frequency point is compared with the physical-optics-inspired (POI) SVR [9], which is a physical-inspired method. As shown in the Table 2 gives the RMSE and cost time comparison of different models.…”
Section: B Mono-rcs Of the Slicy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with algorithms in similar literatures or other ML benchmark techniques, the RMSE of the SLICY model is reduced from 36.6% to 66.1%. In Table 3, the mono-RCS prediction capability of the proposed method for a single frequency point is compared with the physical-optics-inspired (POI) SVR [9], which is a physical-inspired method. As shown in the Table 2 gives the RMSE and cost time comparison of different models.…”
Section: B Mono-rcs Of the Slicy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have proposed ML models for EM solver design [2], repairing damaged receivers' data [3], and low scattering meta-surface design [4], etc. ML has also been applied in RCS prediction [5][6][7][8][9][10], but the existing techniques still have some limitations. For instance, 8326 samples are required for a single frequency point in [5], which may not be applicable for computationally expensive EM problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AI techniques have been introduced into communications over the last two decades. They have addressed many bottlenecks that the conventional methods are not able to resolve, from communication system design to propagation channel research [18], [23]- [26], with the latter being the focus of this section 1 .…”
Section: B Application Of ML To Propagation Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It predicts EM characteristics of any point in the design space, reducing the time needed for device design and optimization. Various machine learning methods, including support vector regression (SVR), gaussian process regression (GPR), Kriging, back propagation neural network (BPNN), and deep learning, are used for surrogate modeling [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Deep learning has been recently applied to metasurface design, allowing for more efficient and automated processes [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%