2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2009.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient methods for calculating the number of states, levels and lines in atomic configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and M J,min = −M J,max [54]. In that case, the excess of J values is equal to the excess of M J values [55].…”
Section: Propensity Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…and M J,min = −M J,max [54]. In that case, the excess of J values is equal to the excess of M J values [55].…”
Section: Propensity Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less attention has been paid to the consequences of treating large ensembles of energy levels as simple states void of internal structure in plasmas far from equilibrium. We might expect these consequences to be most obvious in the screened hydrogenic models whose superconfigurations can represent tens of thousands of fine structure levels [35]; this will be the focus of the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This led us to develop efficient algorithms for the numbering of LS terms and J levels. 9 We have also extended the statistical modelling of the distribution of quantum states in order to better describe configurations having open sub-shells with a large angular momentum.…”
Section: Hybrid Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%