Efficient Impact Analysis of Changes in the Requirements of Manufacturing Automation Systems

Teufl, Sabine; Hackenberg, Georg

doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.296

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To increase the quality of requirements Rösch et al (2015) and Teufl and Hackenberg (2015) introduced description of behavior based on MSCs included in the MIRA (Broy and Stølen, 2001) approach and UML SD. Both approaches have been evaluated with the crane being a part of the PPU.…”

Section: Requirements Modeling Of the Ppu Scenario Sc12-self Healingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of software in automated production systems: Challenges and research directions

Vogel‐Heuser

Fay

Schaefer

et al. 2015

Journal of Systems and Software

243

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tCoping with evolution in automated production systems implies a cross-disciplinary challenge along the system's life-cycle for variant-rich systems of high complexity. The authors from computer science and automation provide an interdisciplinary survey on challenges and state of the art in evolution of automated production systems. Selected challenges are illustrated on the case of a simple pick and place unit. In the first part of the paper, we discuss the development process of automated production systems as well as the different type of evolutions during the system's life-cycle on the case of a pick and place unit. In the second part, we survey the challenges associated with evolution in the different development phases and a couple of cross-cutting areas and review existing approaches addressing the challenges. We close with summarizing future research directions to address the challenges of evolution in automated production systems.

show abstract

Section: Requirements Modeling Of the Ppu Scenario Sc12-self Healingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of software in automated production systems: Challenges and research directions

Vogel‐Heuser

Fay

Schaefer

et al. 2015

Journal of Systems and Software

243

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Nature of Software Evolution

Taentzer

Goedicke

Paech

et al. 2019

Managed Software Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this chapter, we consider the nature of software evolution: What kinds of software systems are evolved? Which quality aspects of software systems play a role throughout evolution? What kinds of software changes exist, and which evolution processes are considered? What is the impact of these changes? The purpose of this chapter is to clarify the fundamental aspects of software evolution, which are being taken up again in the following chapters. Hence, this chapter shall explain the basic terminology used in this book. To a small extent, it shall also provide a domain analysis of the area of software evolution. And finally, for more details,

show abstract

An immune designed ontology to specify requirements and recommend layout solutions

Amri

Darmoul

Hajri-Gabouj

2018

2018 International Conference on Advanced Systems and Electric Technologies (IC_ASET)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Efficient Impact Analysis of Changes in the Requirements of Manufacturing Automation Systems

Cited by 5 publications

References 18 publications

Evolution of software in automated production systems: Challenges and research directions

Evolution of software in automated production systems: Challenges and research directions

The Nature of Software Evolution

An immune designed ontology to specify requirements and recommend layout solutions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About