1986
DOI: 10.1021/ja00267a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient detection and evaluation of cyclodextrin multiple complex formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as concluded by Cabrer et al [13], the stability constant K 1:2 is low relative to K 1:1 . Hence, the 1:1 stoichiometry model may be descriptive in the b-CD concentration range investigated here, but 1:2 binding cannot be ruled out since complexation stoichiometries may be strongly concentration dependent [59]. The R 2 values for the nonlinear regression analysis were 0.987 and 0.988 for GDC-b-CD and TDC-b-CD complexation, respectively.…”
Section: Complex Formation With Natural â-Cdmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, as concluded by Cabrer et al [13], the stability constant K 1:2 is low relative to K 1:1 . Hence, the 1:1 stoichiometry model may be descriptive in the b-CD concentration range investigated here, but 1:2 binding cannot be ruled out since complexation stoichiometries may be strongly concentration dependent [59]. The R 2 values for the nonlinear regression analysis were 0.987 and 0.988 for GDC-b-CD and TDC-b-CD complexation, respectively.…”
Section: Complex Formation With Natural â-Cdmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…More recently, a number of 2: 1 cyclodextrin-substrate complexes have been characterized (2). With surfactants, a 1:l stoichiometry is usually presumed (3-5) but Hersey and co-workers (6) have demonstrated that a-cyclodextrin binds with alkylsulphate anions in a 2: 1 ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 1:1 stoichiometry inclusion complex between rutin and the host molecule, two equilibria on the plate are expressed as follows (Armstrong et al, 1986;Armstrong and Stine, 1983):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%