Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2426656.2426686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient background subtraction for real-time tracking in embedded camera networks

Abstract: Background subtraction is often the first step of many computer vision applications. For a background subtraction method to be useful in embedded camera networks, it must be both accurate and computationally efficient because of the resource constraints on embedded platforms. This makes many traditional background subtraction algorithms unsuitable for embedded platforms because they use complex statistical models to handle subtle illumination changes. These models make them accurate but the computational requi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Background subtraction method to be used in embedded camera networks [9], it must be precise and computationally feasible. This allows traditional background subtraction algorithms not suitable for embedded platforms because of the illumination changes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background subtraction method to be used in embedded camera networks [9], it must be precise and computationally feasible. This allows traditional background subtraction algorithms not suitable for embedded platforms because of the illumination changes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performances of the proposed method, we compare the results of our method with those of five representative background subtraction algorithms: (1) ARCS [12]; (2) CS-MoG [10]; (3) ViBe [8]; (4) KDE [6]; and (5) GMM [2]. We implement the five algorithms by ourselves, and all the parameters in these algorithms use the proposed default values according to the original papers.…”
Section: Qualitative Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been a growing interest in compressive sensing (CS) and the idea of CS has also been exploited for background subtraction. In [10], an image is divided into small blocks and random projections based on CS are then computed for each block to reduce the data dimensionality. After this, each projection value is modeled by GMM to determine whether the block belongs to foreground or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background subtraction [19] is a widely adopted approach, which, however, often incurs significant computation overhead to resourceconstrained devices. In [26], compressive sensing is applied for background subtraction to reduce computation overhead. In [33], an adaptive background model is proposed to trade off the object detection performance and computation overhead of background subtraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%