2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of work production by spastic muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Another study applied a bicycle ergometer in hemiparetic or spastic patients with chronic stroke, where patients were pedaling with only 1 lower limb. 49 This study observed that the efficiency of positive work production in stroke patients was comparable to healthy subjects, despite significant neurologic impairments.…”
Section: Lower Limbsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…48 Another study applied a bicycle ergometer in hemiparetic or spastic patients with chronic stroke, where patients were pedaling with only 1 lower limb. 49 This study observed that the efficiency of positive work production in stroke patients was comparable to healthy subjects, despite significant neurologic impairments.…”
Section: Lower Limbsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This finding is contrary to previous research that has demonstrated that increased spasticity results in increased energy expenditure. 31 It also has been suggested that spasticity may promote a favorable body composition and muscle mass. 32 Accordingly, it may be that our findings are indicative of the inability of BMI to differentiate between fat-and fat-free mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wutzke et al (2012) have proposed that the hip muscles may be less efficient when replacing the work normally performed at the ankle, without having to perform more work overall. However, in the case of stroke patients, the elevated metabolic cost of walking appears to be explained by greater mechanical work (Detrembleur et al, 2003), without differences in muscle efficiency (Stoquart et al, 2005(Stoquart et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%