2021
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of VEGFR-TKI plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with favorable IMDC prognosis.

Abstract: 318 Background: Combinations of a PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with a VEGFR-TKI as front-line/treatment-naïve therapy significantly improve the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. The benefit of these combinations is well evident in IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk population, while it is unclear in the subgroup of mRCC patients with favorable prognosis. We performed a meta-analysis with the aim to evaluate whether the addition of ICIs to VEGFR-TKIs is able to improve t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy (ICT) combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) are now established standard of care regimens across diverse malignancies such as renal cell carcinoma, endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (1)(2)(3)(4). However, there is limited knowledge about the potential synergistic toxicities between combination of ICT with VEGFi when compared to ICT alone (5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy (ICT) combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) are now established standard of care regimens across diverse malignancies such as renal cell carcinoma, endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (1)(2)(3)(4). However, there is limited knowledge about the potential synergistic toxicities between combination of ICT with VEGFi when compared to ICT alone (5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%