2019
DOI: 10.1002/jca.21707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of three filgrastim‐intended copies for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in healthy adult and pediatric donors in Mexico

Abstract: Introduction: The use of filgrastim biosimilars for healthy adult and pediatric donor mobilization in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been met with increased safety and efficacy concerns in contrast to generic small molecule drugs. In Mexico, several filgrastim-intended copies (FIC) have been available and marketed since 2001, while no clinical comparability studies to evaluate their use in this setting have been published and thus are not considered to be true biosimilars. In this study, we report… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stem cell harvests were performed after the use of biosimilar standard G-CSF 28 at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day subcutaneously for 4 days from days 1 to 4, with or without plerixafor at a single dose of 0.12 mg/kg administered subcutaneously, 11 hours before leukapheresis. 29 Additional plerixafor was administered to some patients taking G-CSF due to ongoing clinical trials at our center and these were also included in the retrospective analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stem cell harvests were performed after the use of biosimilar standard G-CSF 28 at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day subcutaneously for 4 days from days 1 to 4, with or without plerixafor at a single dose of 0.12 mg/kg administered subcutaneously, 11 hours before leukapheresis. 29 Additional plerixafor was administered to some patients taking G-CSF due to ongoing clinical trials at our center and these were also included in the retrospective analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%