2003
DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1274
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Efficacy of Selected Hand Hygiene Agents Used to Remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a Surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) From Contaminated Hands

Abstract: ContextThe intentional use of Bacillus anthracis transmitted via the US mail in October-November 2001 resulted in 22 people developing inhalation or cutaneous anthrax. Glove use with handwashing prior to and after contact with potential contaminated environmental surfaces and cutaneous lesions has been recommended. However, only limited data are available on the susceptibility of B anthracis to antiseptics.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
113
13
9
4

Citation Types

1
70
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
108
16
8
1

Relationship

1
132

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 133 publications

(73 citation statements)
references

References 22 publications

1
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Different dip-coating speeds, such as 0.75 mm/s, 1.50 mm/s, and 2.25 mm/s, were used to coat the glass substrates. The efficiency of the bactericidal activity of TiO 2 increased with increasing calcination temperature, which is consistent with previous observations of bare TiO 2 (2,11,35). However, the bactericidal efficiency of TiO 2 /Ag increased with decreasing calcination temperature.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 91%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Different dip-coating speeds, such as 0.75 mm/s, 1.50 mm/s, and 2.25 mm/s, were used to coat the glass substrates. The efficiency of the bactericidal activity of TiO 2 increased with increasing calcination temperature, which is consistent with previous observations of bare TiO 2 (2,11,35). However, the bactericidal efficiency of TiO 2 /Ag increased with decreasing calcination temperature.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 91%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Contrary to EN 12791 [5], the test condition for hand washing was reduced from one minute to 15 seconds to not impede subsequent hand antisepsis [8]. This is a reasonable approach, as Weber et al [7] showed that even 10 seconds are sufficient to reach a reduction of microbial counts. A washing duration of 30 or 60 seconds did not improve the results.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In those studies, control measures against the outbreak were implemented. It included sterilizing linens by autoclaving, cleansing washing machines with a powerful detergent, and washing hands with soap instead of alcohol 19) , and promoting the use of gloves among the hospital staff during patient care.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%