1981
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90195-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients with coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous myocardial infarction (MI) was diag nosed on the basis of history [ l-4] or the presence of Q waves or either [2,5,6]. Left ventricular (LV) function was abnormal in 6 studies [4,[7][8][9][10][11] on ventriculographic assessment and was considered poor if LV ejection fraction was less than 50 [ I ].…”
Section: Differences In Defining Preoperative Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous myocardial infarction (MI) was diag nosed on the basis of history [ l-4] or the presence of Q waves or either [2,5,6]. Left ventricular (LV) function was abnormal in 6 studies [4,[7][8][9][10][11] on ventriculographic assessment and was considered poor if LV ejection fraction was less than 50 [ I ].…”
Section: Differences In Defining Preoperative Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left ventricular (LV) function was abnormal in 6 studies [4,[7][8][9][10][11] on ventriculographic assessment and was considered poor if LV ejection fraction was less than 50 [ I ]. 45 [2], 40 [5], 35 [ 12] or 30% [ 13], LV enddiastolic pressure was consid ered raised if it was more than 15 [ 1. 9].…”
Section: Differences In Defining Preoperative Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A multifactorial analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) with stratification by operation showed that the relative annual risk ofdeath associated with being over 70 at operation was 1-45, (95% CI 0-97 to [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], that for operation after 1980 was 0-79 (95% CI 0X52 to 1X21), and that for being female was 0-95 (95% CI 0-65 to When we compared the expected and actual survival rates in the study population, we found that the expected one year rate was 96-4% and the actual rate was 88 0%. For the five year rates the corresponding figures were 80-1% expected compared with 74-4% actual.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%