Efficacy of an Accelerometer-Guided Physical Activity Intervention in Community-Dwelling Older Women

Koizumi, Daisuke; Rogers, Nicole; Rogers, Michael E.; Islam, Mohammad Monirul; Kusünoki, Masanobu; Takeshima, Nobuo

doi:10.1123/jpah.6.4.467

Cited by 33 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding the effects of the education program on health behavior, average number of steps per day, physical activity level, and dietary variety increased significantly. Based on existing physical activity intervention research findings, in which typical behavioral change techniques (feedback, goal‐setting) were provided, participants took 7% to 54% more steps per day . In the present study, intervention group participants actively learned the importance of healthy lifestyle, and planned behavioral change independently planned behavioral change.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Effects of Active Learning on Health Literacy and Behavior in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Uemura

Yamada

Okamoto

2018

J American Geriatrics Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Effects of Active Learning on Health Literacy and Behavior in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Uemura

Yamada

Okamoto

2018

J American Geriatrics Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Accelerometers are particularly useful in providing objective feedback of ambulatory activity to investigators and study participants in exercise adherence research [75]. Koizumi et al [76] evaluated the efficacy of accelerometer-based feedback on daily physical activity in community-dwelling older women and found that using accelerometers can significantly improve the quantity and quality of daily physical activity as well as cardiorespiratory endurance.…”

Section: Biomechanical Biofeedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biofeedback in rehabilitation

Giggins

Persson

Caulfield

2013

J NeuroEngineering Rehabil

516

324

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews the literature relating to the biofeedback used in physical rehabilitation. The biofeedback methods used in rehabilitation are based on biomechanical measurements and measurements of the physiological systems of the body. The physiological systems of the body which can be measured to provide biofeedback are the neuromuscular system, the respiratory system and the cardiovascular system. Neuromuscular biofeedback methods include electromyography (EMG) biofeedback and real-time ultrasound imaging (RTUS) biofeedback. EMG biofeedback is the most widely investigated method of biofeedback and appears to be effective in the treatment of many musculoskeletal conditions and in post cardiovascular accident (CVA) rehabilitation. RTUS biofeedback has been demonstrated effective in the treatment of low back pain (LBP) and pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. Cardiovascular biofeedback methods have been shown to be effective in the treatment of a number of health conditions such as hypertension, heart failure, asthma, fibromyalgia and even psychological disorders however a systematic review in this field has yet to be conducted. Similarly, the number of large scale studies examining the use of respiratory biofeedback in rehabilitation is limited. Measurements of movement, postural control and force output can be made using a number of different devices and used to deliver biomechanical biofeedback. Inertial based sensing biofeedback is the most widely researched biomechanical biofeedback method, with a number of studies showing it to be effective in improving measures of balance in a number of populations. Other types of biomechanical biofeedback include force plate systems, electrogoniometry, pressure biofeedback and camera based systems however the evidence for these is limited. Biofeedback is generally delivered using visual displays, acoustic or haptic signals, however more recently virtual reality (VR) or exergaming technology have been used as biofeedback signals. VR and exergaming technology have been primarily investigated in post-CVA rehabilitation, however, more recent work has shown this type of biofeedback to be effective in improving exercise technique in musculoskeletal populations. While a number of studies in this area have been conducted, further large scale studies and reviews investigating different biofeedback applications in different clinical populations are required.

show abstract

“…The future of motivating with accelerometers has been demonstrated by Koizumi, et al 12 Although not focused on cancer survivors specifically, their intervention allowed participants to download their accelerometer results to review for motivational purposes. This same concept supports future studies of biometric calorie management systems (e.g., bodybuggR) that combine accelerometer data with other body measurements (e.g., skin temperature, etc)(http://www.bodybugg.com/science_behind_bodybugg.php) to provide caloric expenditure information that can be downloaded by the individual.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 Objective monitoring, however, can be less expensive (depending on the equipment used and clinical charges for testing) and is a valid tool for assessing PA in the field and motivating PA adherence. 9–12 Their dual purpose and potential for objectivity support accelerometers and pedometers as particularly useful tools for optimizing the health benefits of PA after a cancer diagnosis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Objective monitoring of physical activity after a cancer diagnosis: challenges and opportunities for enhancing cancer control

Rogers

2010

Physical Therapy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Because physical activity (PA) provides multiple medical and psychosocial benefits after a cancer diagnosis, greater integration of objective activity monitoring into research and clinical practice is warranted. Objectives To review randomized PA trials in cancer survivors after diagnosis using an accelerometer or pedometer and make recommendations for integrating objective monitoring into research and practice. Major Findings Ten published PA and post-cancer diagnosis randomized trials have used pedometers (n=3), accelerometers (n=3), or both (n=4). Pedometers were primarily used to motivate PA adherence with several studies also using unblinded pedometers to assess the intervention effect on PA adherence. Accelerometers were primarily used to assess PA adherence after a PA intervention with one study using accelerometers to assess PA increase as a benefit of a non-PA intervention. One study used accelerometers to document sufficient ground forces for improving bone density in cancer survivors. Across studies, the reported objective monitoring outcome varied and was not always consistent with the stated intervention goal. Conclusions PA and post-cancer diagnosis randomized trials have used objective monitoring primarily for motivation and/or adherence assessment. Investigators and practitioners are encouraged to expand the use of objective monitoring to also include understanding mechanisms of PA benefits and assess non-PA treatment modality effects. Future clinical and research protocols should consider the 1) outcome to be measured and reported, 2) need (or not) for blinding of the instrument outputs to participants, 3) appropriateness of activity intensity cutpoints for interpreting accelerometer data, and 4) logistical issues relevant to cancer survivors after diagnosis.

show abstract

Efficacy of an Accelerometer-Guided Physical Activity Intervention in Community-Dwelling Older Women

Cited by 33 publications

References 18 publications

Effects of Active Learning on Health Literacy and Behavior in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Active Learning on Health Literacy and Behavior in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Biofeedback in rehabilitation

Objective monitoring of physical activity after a cancer diagnosis: challenges and opportunities for enhancing cancer control

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About