2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01393.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Additional Ablation of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms for Catheter Ablation of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract: Ablation of continuous CFEs after PVI and LA linear ablation had a better long-term efficacy based on the results of single-ablation procedure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ablation of CFAEs for the treatment of AF was introduced by Nademanee et al 14 In 3 randomized trials, predominantly with smaller patient cohorts, ablation of CFAEs in addition to PVI demonstrated lower rates of recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias than stand-alone PVI. 5,8,10 Furthermore, additional linear ablation demonstrated better clinical outcomes in another 3 randomized trials. 6,7,12 Nonetheless, results of other trials did not show a clinical benefit of additional CFAE ablation, 4,9 and the recently published STAR AF II trial revealed no difference in clinical outcomes when comparing stand-alone PVI to PVI plus additional CFAE or linear ablation in a large cohort of patients with persistent AF.…”
Section: Current Ablation Strategies For Chronic Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ablation of CFAEs for the treatment of AF was introduced by Nademanee et al 14 In 3 randomized trials, predominantly with smaller patient cohorts, ablation of CFAEs in addition to PVI demonstrated lower rates of recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias than stand-alone PVI. 5,8,10 Furthermore, additional linear ablation demonstrated better clinical outcomes in another 3 randomized trials. 6,7,12 Nonetheless, results of other trials did not show a clinical benefit of additional CFAE ablation, 4,9 and the recently published STAR AF II trial revealed no difference in clinical outcomes when comparing stand-alone PVI to PVI plus additional CFAE or linear ablation in a large cohort of patients with persistent AF.…”
Section: Current Ablation Strategies For Chronic Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The optimal strategy for persistent AF is not known, and previous studies investigating more extensive ablation strategies in addition to PVI demonstrated heterogeneous results. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The recently published STAR AF 2 trial (Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial) compared initial stand-alone PVI to PVI with additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) or additional linear ablation and could not demonstrate a superior outcome for the additional ablation strategies. 13 The prospective and randomized Alster-Lost-AF © 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details about the CFAE mapping and ablation were reported in our previous publications. 12,13 In brief, the CFAE ablation was confined to the continuous CFAEs, defined as an electrogram fractionation or repetitive rapid activity lasting for >8 seconds with an averaged fractionated interval of <50 ms over 5 seconds, 14 in the LA and right atrium. The end point of the CFAE ablation was to obtain a prolongation of the cycle length (disappearance of continuous CFAEs), eliminate the CFAEs (thus, a fractionation interval of >120 ms, and disappearance of CFAEs), or abolish the local fractionated potentials (bipolar voltage of <0.05 mV).…”
Section: Stepwise Catheter Ablation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFE ablation was confined to the continuous CFEs in the LA and CS. 16,17 Considering the possible complications caused by the long procedure time and efficacy of the RA substrate modification, 18 we did not routinely ablate the CFEs in the RA. The end point of the CFE site ablation was to obtain a prolongation of the cycle length, eliminate the CFEs (thus, FI Ͼ120 ms), or abolish the local fractionated potentials (bipolar voltage Ͻ0.05 mV).…”
Section: Catheter Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%