2007
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-2058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of a Pentavalent Human-Bovine (WC3) Reassortant Rotavirus Vaccine at the End of Shelf Life

Abstract: This pentavalent human-bovine rotavirus vaccine was generally well tolerated, efficacious, and immunogenic at the end of shelf life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
94
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
94
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…RV5 showed high and consistent efficacy in preventing RGE in randomised clinical trials that were previously conducted in countries with high standards of medical care (Vesikari et al 2006, Block et al 2007). In addition, recent effectiveness studies in the USA and Nicaragua showed that RV5 is effective in protecting against rotavirus-related hospitalisations , Boom et al 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…RV5 showed high and consistent efficacy in preventing RGE in randomised clinical trials that were previously conducted in countries with high standards of medical care (Vesikari et al 2006, Block et al 2007). In addition, recent effectiveness studies in the USA and Nicaragua showed that RV5 is effective in protecting against rotavirus-related hospitalisations , Boom et al 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…9 RV5 and RV1 have proven highly efficacious and effective in industrialised countries, providing at least 90% protection against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis and at least 74% protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis of any severity. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In contrast, studies conducted in low-income countries in Africa and Asia revealed that the efficacy of the 2 vaccines ranged from 56% to 64% in protecting against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. [25][26][27][28][29][30] In addition, in these settings vaccine efficacy waned between the first and second years after immunisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3% increase in the incidence of diarrhea and vomiting was observed with RV5, but these symptoms were mild and did not require treatment. 6,8,18 For RV1, no difference versus placebo was observed in the incidence of diarrhea, fever or severe fever, vomiting or severe vomiting, and irritability or severe irritability within 14 days of immunization with any dose. 9,10,13,15 There was no statistically significant increased risk for death or other serious adverse events noted with either vaccine compared with placebo.…”
Section: Reactogenicitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The safety and efficacy of RV5 and RV1 for prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis in healthy infants have been evaluated in 11 randomized, controlled trials involving more than 146 000 infants worldwide (Table 2), including 3 randomized, controlled trials for RV5 [6][7][8] and 7 randomized, controlled trials for RV1. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] …”
Section: Monovalent Human Rotavirus Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%