1976
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1976.230.2.298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of vasoconstrictors on intestinal vascular resistance and oxygen extraction

Abstract: To delineate the mechanism through which vasoactive compounds alter intestinal oxygen consumption and to determine the pharmacological nature of the receptors involved, we quantitated the effects of vasoconstrictors on arteriovenous oxygen difference and on vascular resistance in isolated constant-flow perfused canine small bowel. Norepinephrine (NE) and sympathetic stimulation (SS) increased vascular resistance and depressed O2 extraction. These effects were not altered by beta-blockade, but were abolished by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
3

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in a significant increase in both parameters (p<0.05) become compromised. These concerns are based on studies performed with extremely high doses of NE infused directly into the renal artery [12,13], other shortterm studies based on acute invasive or indirect measurements [10,11,17,18] or studies using microsphere technology [19], which allow assessment of regional circulations only at a particular moment in time. Despite the limitations and questionable clinical relevance of such studies NE has developed a reputation as a dangerous drug [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in a significant increase in both parameters (p<0.05) become compromised. These concerns are based on studies performed with extremely high doses of NE infused directly into the renal artery [12,13], other shortterm studies based on acute invasive or indirect measurements [10,11,17,18] or studies using microsphere technology [19], which allow assessment of regional circulations only at a particular moment in time. Despite the limitations and questionable clinical relevance of such studies NE has developed a reputation as a dangerous drug [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catecholamines induce vasoconstriction or vasodilation depending on whether α-or β-adrenergic receptors are activated. Exogenous epinephrine at low doses induces vasodilation via β-adrenergic receptors and at high doses, vasoconstriction via α-adrenergic receptors (375,442). The α-adrenergic agonist, norepinephrine, elicits vasoconstriction; however, autoregulatory escape occurs during prolonged norepinephrine administration (103,199,375,442).…”
Section: Circulating Vasoactive Substancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the levels of circulating catechol amines have been reported to increase abruptly during hypoxia in fetal and newborn lambs [Cohen et al, 1982]. Epinephrine and norepinephrine are known to affect mesen teric blood flow and have been implicated in the redistribution of flow within the wall of the small intestine in adult animals [Hulten et al, 1977;Shepherd et al, 1976]. In lamb fetuses norepinephrine significantly de creased blood flow to the abdominal organs, as well as to the liver and spleen [Zink and VanPetten, 1981].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%