1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(88)80060-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of two treatments on semen from different bulls on in vitro fertilization results of bovine oocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In bovine IVF systems, both caffeine and theophylline have been used to induce sperm capacitation [11,[20][21][22][23]. Although theophylline has a greater ability to inhibit PDE than does caffeine [15], only caffeine has been applied for a majority of current porcine IVF systems [2, 3, 6-8, 12, 24, 25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bovine IVF systems, both caffeine and theophylline have been used to induce sperm capacitation [11,[20][21][22][23]. Although theophylline has a greater ability to inhibit PDE than does caffeine [15], only caffeine has been applied for a majority of current porcine IVF systems [2, 3, 6-8, 12, 24, 25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various chemicals such as caffeine [1,2], heparin [3,4], calcium ionophore A23187 [5], and caffeine plus heparin [6] or caffeine plus calcium ionophore A23187 [7] have been used to induce capacitation of bovine spermatozoa in vitro. However, BSA is always included in media used for in vitro fertilization in these experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the applied modification limiting preparation of these fractions only to a centrifugation of thawed sperm did not allow removing dead spermatozoa that had been damaged following the cryoconservation procedure, which might exert a detrimental effect on fertilization results. Several authors dealing with in vitro embryo production in cattle (MILLER and HUNTER, 1987;AOYAGI et al, 1988;EYESTONE and FIRST, 1989;GALLI and LAZZARI, 1996;KĄTSKA et al, 1996;CHAMBERLAND et al, 2001;GALLI et al, 2003;KĄTSKA-KSIĄŻKIEWICZ et al, 2005) have described the variability among bulls in the ability of their sperm to become capacitated, fertilize oocytes and subsequently produce competent embryos developing to the blastocyst stage. In terms of factors affecting the outcome of IVF, bull variability has been the main source of difficulty in the work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only successful method of sexing spermatozoa is quantifying sperm DNA-binding dye, followed by flow cytometry and cell sorting. The previous experiments on bovine IVF (MILLER and HUNTER, 1987;AOYAGI et al, 1988;EYESTONE and FIRST, 1989;KĄTSKA et al, 1996;CHAMBERLAND et al, 2001;KĄTSKA-KSIĄŻKIEWICZ et al, 2005) have shown that in terms of factors affecting the outcome of the procedure bull variability has appeared to be the main source of differentiation in the efficiency of this technology. When sexed sperm is used the efficiency of IVF may be affected not only by bull effect but by differentiated susceptibility of bull spermatozoa to Hoechst 3342 staining as well (SMORĄG et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%