Pendulum Impact Machines: Procedures and Specimens for Verification 1995
DOI: 10.1520/stp14662s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the Striking Edge Radius and Asymmetrical Strikes on Charpy Impact Test Results

Abstract: The effects of the striking edge radius of the Charpy impact test on the absorbed energy and lateral expansion were investigated. The effects of the changes of the length of test specimens and effects of symmetry of test specimens was also investigated. The absorbed energy of the 8mmR's was higher than the 2mmR's as in the study by Naniwa et al.[1]. For every machine tested, the absorbed energy was higher when the striking point did not contact the specimen opposite the notch. The effects of the length of test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A striking tup with a 1.5-mm radius was chosen. This parameter has a strong influence on the energy transmitted (Tanaka et al 1995). The distance between the supports was 240 mm.…”
Section: Charpy Impact Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A striking tup with a 1.5-mm radius was chosen. This parameter has a strong influence on the energy transmitted (Tanaka et al 1995). The distance between the supports was 240 mm.…”
Section: Charpy Impact Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, values as low as 60 J (Towers 1983;Morita and Kobayashi 2004) or 100 J (Siewert and Vigliotti 1995) were also reported for some materials. This threshold appears to be material-dependent (Nanstad and Sokolov 1995) and related to the characteristic fracture properties of the material (Tanaka et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main reasons for this increase in KV, often observed when test specimens do not separate, were identified in the interaction between the specimen and the 8 mm-striker corners and in the increased friction between specimen and anvils (Tanaka et al 1995). In additional, the standard deviation of results was also reported to be significantly larger for the 2 mm-striker (Siewert and Vigliotti 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations