Chemoreception in the Carotid Body 1977
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66755-8_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Temperature and Stimulating Agents on Carotid Body Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This association of transmitter release and excitation of afferent nerve activity is common to a number of chemostimuli, and has contributed to the idea that the catecholamine-containing type I cells, which lie in synaptic contact with the afferent sinus nerve endings (McDonald & Mitchell, 1975), are the sites of detection and transduction of chemostimuli (see Fidone & Gonzalez, 1986, for review). ]Patch-clamp studies have revealed that type I carotid body cells contain an array of ion channel types (Lopez-Barneo, Lopez-Lopez, Urenfa & Gonzalez, 1988;Duchen, Caddy, Kirby, Patterson, Ponte & Biscoe, 1988;Hescheler, Delpiano, Acker & Pietruschka, 1989;Peers, 1990a;Peers & O'Donnell, 1990) and that chemostimuli such as hypoxia and extracellular acidity selectively inhibit K+ currents in these cells, although the specific type of K+ current has not always been fully characterized (Lopez-Barneo et al 1988;Hescheler et al 1989;Peers, 1990a, b;Peers & O'Donnell, 1990). Such findings are consistent with earlier observations that chemostimuli most commonly depolarize type I cells (Eyzaguirre, Baron & Gallego, 1977;Eyzaguirre, 1981;Fidone & GonzaElez, 1986), although it remains to be demonstrated whether K+ current suppression alone causes type I cell depolarization, and what role this effect may play in stimulus-induced transmitter release.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This association of transmitter release and excitation of afferent nerve activity is common to a number of chemostimuli, and has contributed to the idea that the catecholamine-containing type I cells, which lie in synaptic contact with the afferent sinus nerve endings (McDonald & Mitchell, 1975), are the sites of detection and transduction of chemostimuli (see Fidone & Gonzalez, 1986, for review). ]Patch-clamp studies have revealed that type I carotid body cells contain an array of ion channel types (Lopez-Barneo, Lopez-Lopez, Urenfa & Gonzalez, 1988;Duchen, Caddy, Kirby, Patterson, Ponte & Biscoe, 1988;Hescheler, Delpiano, Acker & Pietruschka, 1989;Peers, 1990a;Peers & O'Donnell, 1990) and that chemostimuli such as hypoxia and extracellular acidity selectively inhibit K+ currents in these cells, although the specific type of K+ current has not always been fully characterized (Lopez-Barneo et al 1988;Hescheler et al 1989;Peers, 1990a, b;Peers & O'Donnell, 1990). Such findings are consistent with earlier observations that chemostimuli most commonly depolarize type I cells (Eyzaguirre, Baron & Gallego, 1977;Eyzaguirre, 1981;Fidone & GonzaElez, 1986), although it remains to be demonstrated whether K+ current suppression alone causes type I cell depolarization, and what role this effect may play in stimulus-induced transmitter release.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Increases in sinus nerve discharge caused by a variety of natural and chemical stimuli (including acidity) are also closely associated with release of transmitter substances from type I carotid body cells, particularly dopamine (Rigual et al 1984;Obeso et al 1987). Microelectrode recordings from type I cells, have shown variable changes in the responses of membrane potential to chemostimuli (presumably due to the unavoidable damage caused by impalement of these small cells) but one consistent observation is that extracellular acidity causes type I cell depolarization (Eyzaguirre et al 1977;Eyzaguirre, 1981). This finding is consistent with more recent patch-clamp experiments which have demonstrated that lowered pH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in R, also did not follow a consistent pattern (162,163). These results are similar to, but less pronounced than, those obtained with cyanide or ACh.…”
Section: Effects Of Temperature On Mp and R Of Glomussupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Although changes in membrane potential of the type I cells were not observed by Baron & Eyzaguirre (1977) and Eyzaguirre, Baron & Gallego (1977) with changes in [K+]0, these results should be interpreted with caution, since the measured resting membrane potentials (19-8 + 0-4 mV) were much smaller than those found in a later study (52-56 mV) (Hayashida & Eyzaguirre, 1979). In this regard membrane potential did not change on application of acetylcholine in the study , whereas it was found to markedly depolarize type I cells in the study by Hayashida & Eyzaguirre (1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%