1999
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1999.1414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Spatial Grouping on the Functional Response of Predators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
312
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 458 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
312
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Beddington(1975), DeAngelis et al(1975), Hassell and Varley(1969)). This view is also plausible biologically (Cosner et al(1999)). When p(x) = αx/(m + x) and g(x/K) = r(1 − x/K), model (1.2) becomes the following well studied Michaelis-Menten type predator-prey system (see the references cited in Kuang and Freedman(1988)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(Beddington(1975), DeAngelis et al(1975), Hassell and Varley(1969)). This view is also plausible biologically (Cosner et al(1999)). When p(x) = αx/(m + x) and g(x/K) = r(1 − x/K), model (1.2) becomes the following well studied Michaelis-Menten type predator-prey system (see the references cited in Kuang and Freedman(1988)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The public believes this resulted from the fragmentation of habitats and the ever shrinking sizes of these patches which may diminish or deprive of prey refugees (Fischer (2000)). The consensus view is that ratio dependent formulation breaks down when the patch size is large and both the prey and predator densities are low (Arditi and Ginzburg (1989), Cosner et al (1999), Abrams and Ginzburg (2000)), since in such case, predators will spend most effort in searching rather than interfering each other. Hence, the functional response is likely to be much more sensible to prey density than predator density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, deterministic mutual extinction is an extreme outcome calls for extreme measures. Ratio dependence, while a special case of the general predator dependence ones, such as the Beddington-DeAngelis or Hassel-Varley type (Cosner et al (1999)), is currently the only one that provides a simple and plausible explanation of such extinction dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ranked in order of increasing intensity, these can include aggressive displays and posturing, fighting, and intraspecific killing (e.g., infanticide) and cannibalism (Fox, 1975;Krebs and Davies, 1981). When the principal effect of the intraspecific interference is a reduced rate of feeding or resource intake, the effects are probably best modeled via an altered functional response for the consumer (DeAngelis et al, 1975;Cosner et al, 1999;Skalski and Gilliam, 2001). However, even adaptive foraging can lead to intraspecific interference (Abrams, 1984b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%