Effects of soil organic carbon (SOC) content and accessibility in subsoils on the sorption processes of the model pollutants nonylphenol (4-n-NP) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Effect of soil organic matter on the plant uptake of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulphonic acid (PFOS) in lettuce on granular activated carbon-applied soil

“…They are also influenced by the leaching and adsorption potential of the soil which is influenced by soil properties such as pH, mineral content, anion exchange capacity and SOM (Li et al 2019;Wei et al 2017;Xiang et al 2018). The log Kds values of soil were reported in the range of -0.97-1.69, and -1.0-35.3, for PFOA and PFOS respectively, with higher Kds values observed in soil with a greater SOM content (Kupryianchyk et al 2015;Martz et al 2019;Milinovic et al 2015;Silvani et al 2019;Zareitalabad et al 2013). This explains why lower PUFs for PFOA and PFOS were observed in the soil containing 4.0% SOM compared to the soil with 2.6% SOM.…”

Adsorption of EDCs on Reclaimed Water-Irrigated Soils: A Comparative Analysis of a Branched Nonylphenol, Nonylphenol and Bisphenol A

“…The correlation coefficient of NP 7 was 0.98 for the Linear model, so generally the adsorption of NP and NP 7 on soil followed the Linear model and were similar with the previous studies. Düring et al [44], Murillo-Torres et al [45] and Martz et al [46] concluded that NP followed a Linear adsorption model on agricultural soils, while Francis et al [47] and Jiang et al [48] concluded that the Freundlich model and Dubinin-Ashtakhov (DA) model were appropriate for the adsorption of NP on soil. The adsorption of BPA was in accordance with the Freundlich model in this study (R 2 = 0.95).…”

“…[45] and Martz et al [46] concluded that NP followed a Linear adsorption model on agricultural soils, while Francis et al [47] and Jiang et al [48] concluded that the Freundlich model and Dubinin-Ashtakhov (DA) model were appropriate for the adsorption of NP on soil. The adsorption of BPA was in accordance with the Freundlich model in this study (R 2 = 0.95).…”

Dynamic capacity modelling of soil environment carrying capacity, and developing a soil quality early warning framework for development land in China

“…Previous studies have shown that soil NAC is sensitive to at least two factors: (a) the physico-chemical properties of the soil, e.g. soil organic carbon accessibility may affect pollutant stabilization or sorption processes (Gan et al, 2019), and (b) the physico-chemical properties of the pollutant itself (Martz et al, 2019;. In addition, natural environmental and human-induced changes in the soil, such as rainfall, land cover, topography, geology, land management and pollution control interventions, can also help explain the variance of NAC (Kheir et al, 2014;Razanamahandry et al, 2018).…”