2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01877-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of smoking and smoking abstinence on spatial vision in chronic heavy smokers

Abstract: Cigarette smoke is a complex chemical mixture, involving health-damaging components such as carbon monoxide, ammonia, pyridine, toluene and nicotine. While cognitive functions have been well documented in heavy smokers, spatial vision has been less characterized. In the article, we investigated smoking effects through contrast sensitivity function (CSF), a rigorous procedure that measures the spatial vision. Data were recorded from 48 participants, a group of non-smokers (n = 16), a group of chronic and heavy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects could be due to age or some other confounding factor differing between the two groups such as education, sex, smoking, cognitive impairments, and depression, which can affect contrast sensitivity. [35][36][37] Partial correlations between each dependent variable and age were evaluated while controlling for the effects of sex (male or female), smoking (yes or no), education (score from 0 to 5), cognitive impairments (score of MMSE), and depression (score of GHQ). The aging effects on photon noise, neural noise, and calculation efficiency all remained significant after controlling for these factors (r ¼ 0.38, P < 0.05; r ¼ 0.36, P < 0.05; r ¼ À0.62, P < 0.001, respectively), which shows that the observed aging effects cannot be explained by these factors (sex, smoking, education, cognitive impairments, and depression).…”
Section: Internal Noise Sources and Mtfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects could be due to age or some other confounding factor differing between the two groups such as education, sex, smoking, cognitive impairments, and depression, which can affect contrast sensitivity. [35][36][37] Partial correlations between each dependent variable and age were evaluated while controlling for the effects of sex (male or female), smoking (yes or no), education (score from 0 to 5), cognitive impairments (score of MMSE), and depression (score of GHQ). The aging effects on photon noise, neural noise, and calculation efficiency all remained significant after controlling for these factors (r ¼ 0.38, P < 0.05; r ¼ 0.36, P < 0.05; r ¼ À0.62, P < 0.001, respectively), which shows that the observed aging effects cannot be explained by these factors (sex, smoking, education, cognitive impairments, and depression).…”
Section: Internal Noise Sources and Mtfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The session ended after 12 contrast reversals occurred. Higher contrast sensitivity values indicated that the participant had higher sensitivity (for procedural details, see Fernandes et al 1,4,11,13 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimuli for the CSF were linear and vertically oriented and had sine wave gratings with spatial frequencies of 0.2, 0.6, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 cycles per degree (cpd). The stimuli consisted of equiluminant gratings with dimensions of 5 degrees of visual angle, which were presented on the monitor at 2.5° spatial offset from the central cross-shaped fixation point (for stimulus details, see dos Santos et al, 2013 ; Fernandes et al, 2017a ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, heavy tobacco users without neuropsychiatric disorders, regardless of gender or age, also present spatiotemporal impairments ( Kunchulia et al, 2014 ; Fernandes et al, 2017a ). One may argue that this would occur in heavy tobacco users with SCZ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%