2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Selective Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor (PG-116800) to Prevent Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition with PG-116800 failed to reduce LV remodeling or improve clinical outcomes after MI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
147
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
147
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In patients with myocardial infarction, therapeutic interventions directly targeting ECM metabolism through MMP inhibition have produced mixed results. Administration of a selective oral MMP inhibitor in patients with STEMI and reduced ejection fraction showed no significant protection from adverse remodeling (132), despite significant antiremodeling effects in animal models. In contrast, early nonselective MMP inhibition with doxycycline attenuated progression to dilative remodeling in patients with STEMI and left ventricular dysfunction (133).…”
Section: Therapeutic Ecm Targeting In Injured and Remodeling Myocardiummentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In patients with myocardial infarction, therapeutic interventions directly targeting ECM metabolism through MMP inhibition have produced mixed results. Administration of a selective oral MMP inhibitor in patients with STEMI and reduced ejection fraction showed no significant protection from adverse remodeling (132), despite significant antiremodeling effects in animal models. In contrast, early nonselective MMP inhibition with doxycycline attenuated progression to dilative remodeling in patients with STEMI and left ventricular dysfunction (133).…”
Section: Therapeutic Ecm Targeting In Injured and Remodeling Myocardiummentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To date the pharmaceutical industry has failed to provide effective and safe DMOADs for clinical use [13]. The main reasons are that despite their specific targeted action DMOADs still can cause side effects when administered systemically [14][15][16], or when injected intra-articular have a short residence time within the joint [17,18]. It remains unclear how long particular drugs have to remain in the joint for an effective pain relief and/or disease modification after an intra-articular injection.…”
Section: Clinical Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased MMPs activation (such as MMP-1, -2, -3, -8, -9 and -14) is a well-accepted pathway leading to early ECM damage and LV remodeling [21]. The inhibition of MMPs by synthetic inhibitors has been shown to be able to reduce post-infarction adverse remodeling in animals [22][23][24][25], but not in humans [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%