2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0543-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: When comparing studies that investigated training muscle groups between 1 to 3 days per week on a volume-equated basis, the current body of evidence indicates that frequencies of training twice a week promote superior hypertrophic outcomes to once a week. It can therefore be inferred that the major muscle groups should be trained at least twice a week to maximize muscle growth; whether training a muscle group three times per week is superior to a twice-per-week protocol remains to be determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
125
0
15

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
125
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher exercise frequency is generally associated with greater effect [40]. In line with original LiFE, our trainers recommended practicing activities as often as possible, without specifying number of repetitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher exercise frequency is generally associated with greater effect [40]. In line with original LiFE, our trainers recommended practicing activities as often as possible, without specifying number of repetitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies which have used a one to one (client: trainer) ratio have failed to identify any benefits from performing advanced RT methods (Fisher et al, 2014, 2016a,b) likely because all participants, irrespective of group, exercised to true momentary failure due to the supervision. It is our opinion that whilst, supervision ratio is not usually considered in RT meta-analyses (e.g., Rhea et al, 2003; Peterson et al, 2004; Wernbom et al, 2007; Krieger, 2010; Schoenfeld et al, 2015, 2016a,b) possibly since it is often unreported in RT studies; it is an important factor which needs future consideration in both empirical trials and review articles including meta-analyses.…”
Section: Impact Of Resistance Training Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the training volume can be modified by simply manipulating the number of exercises, sets and / or repetitions, as well as by increasing the weekly frequency. Although literature indicates that there is an important dose-response relationship between adaptations caused by RT and training volume [9][10][11][12] , to our knowledge, there are no studies to date comparing the effect of different RT frequencies on BP in elderly women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%