2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of pulsed nutrient inputs on phytoplankton assemblage structure and blooms in an enclosed coastal area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
69
0
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
69
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…During the third phase, in autumn, phytoplankton diversity remained low, probably because less-competitive species were eliminated by the persistent post-summer oligotrophic conditions [24]. The dominance of picophytoplankton confirms the principle that small species are more competitive and abundant in nutrient-depleted conditions [83], and when salinity is higher (August and September at S2).…”
Section: Discussion-conclusionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the third phase, in autumn, phytoplankton diversity remained low, probably because less-competitive species were eliminated by the persistent post-summer oligotrophic conditions [24]. The dominance of picophytoplankton confirms the principle that small species are more competitive and abundant in nutrient-depleted conditions [83], and when salinity is higher (August and September at S2).…”
Section: Discussion-conclusionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Variability of phytoplankton assemblages was explained by (i) the availability of nutrients; (ii) the variation of light; and (iii) mixing conditions [20]. The distribution of species within these assemblages is dependent on the degree of stability and nutrient concentrations [21][22][23][24]. Nutrient inputs can be of natural origin (e.g., rainfall, hydrodynamics; [8,22,25,26]) or anthropogenic origin [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of nutrient supply on phytoplankton population structure is even more unpredictable. While some authors note the negative consequences of increased nutrient input in terms of reduced species diversity and increased occurrences of harmful algal bloom events (Fanuko, 1984;Pan & Subba Rao, 1997;Wang et al, 2006), others emphasize that moderate nutrient inputs can promote biodiversity by stimulating the growth of different taxonomic groups (Spatharis et al, 2007). These theories become even more complex when we consider that zooplankton can obscure changes in the phytoplankton population structure through selective grazing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Coastal marine ecosystems are increasingly affected by nutrient loadings from a variety of anthropogenic sources, including industrial and domestic wastewater and agricultural runoff (Nixon, 1995;Justic et al, 1995;Smith et al, 1999;Spatharis et al, 2007). Untreated domestic and industrial wastewater is considered as one of the main causes of the deterioration of the state of the Mediterranean Sea (UNEP, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous field and laboratory studies have shown that intermittent nutrient supply can dramatically change phytoplankton community composition (Roelke et al 1999;Spatharis et al 2007), that shifts in mixing regimes can lead to changes in competition between fast-and slow-sinking species (Kiørboe 1993;Pinckney et al 1999), and that light attenuation caused by inputs of suspended matter can affect planktonic growth and community structure (Alpine and Cloern 1988;Grémare et al 2003). Nonetheless, the combined effect of these factors on the dynamics of the whole community is still poorly understood, particularly if we disregard extreme events and consider only the most frequent episodes, in which the intensity of the forcing is moderate to low.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%