2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-011-0167-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of processing parameters on morphology of electrospun polystyrene nanofibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible reason is that sulfonic acid groups may have attached to the surface of the PS nanofibers, causing increase in the ionization and dissolution of the PS nanofibers. This result was consistent with a previous work [13] which reported that the noncrosslinked PS nanofibers were soluble at high degrees of sulfonation. Therefore, crosslinking the PS nanofibers are necessary for the preparation of insoluble PSNIE with an acceptable IEC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One possible reason is that sulfonic acid groups may have attached to the surface of the PS nanofibers, causing increase in the ionization and dissolution of the PS nanofibers. This result was consistent with a previous work [13] which reported that the noncrosslinked PS nanofibers were soluble at high degrees of sulfonation. Therefore, crosslinking the PS nanofibers are necessary for the preparation of insoluble PSNIE with an acceptable IEC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This might be due to shrinkage, closer proximity, and additional breaks of the PSNIE at this ratio as compared with the other ratios (Figure 1), which resulted in the lowest IEC. These observations were consistent with a previous study, which revealed that a decrease in IEC is due to the shrinkage and dissolution of the fibers during sulfonation reaction [13]. PS nanofibers were insufficiently crosslinked at a ratio of 50/50, to completely dissolve during the sulfonation reaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations