Effects of Price Regulations and Dark Pools on Financial Market Stability: An Investigation by Multiagent Simulations

Abstract

SUMMARYWe built an artificial market model and investigated the impact of large erroneous orders on financial market price formations. Comparing the case of consented large erroneous orders in the short term with that of continuous small erroneous orders in the long term, if amounts of orders are the same, we found that the orders induced almost the same price fall range. We also analysed effects of price variation limits for erroneous orders and found that price variation limits that employ a limitation term shorter than the time erroneous orders exist effectively prevent large price fluctuations. We also investigated effects of up-tick rules, adopting the trigger method that the Japan Financial Services Agency adopted in November 2013.We also investigated whether dark pools that never provide any order books stabilize markets or not using the model including one lit market, which provides all order books to investors, and one dark pool. We found that markets become more stable as the dark pool is increasingly used. We also found that using the dark pool more reduces the market impacts. However, if other investors' usage rates of dark pools become too large, investors must use the dark pool more than other investors to avoid market impacts. When a tick size of a lit market is larger, dark pools are more useful to avoid market impacts. These results suggest that dark pools stabilize markets when the usage rate is under some threshold and negatively affect the market when the usage rate is over that threshold. Our simulation results suggest the threshold might be much larger than the usage rate in present real financial markets.This study is the first to discuss whether or not several concrete and actually adoptable regulations, including those that have never been employed (e.g. price variation limits with various parameters), could prevent large fluctuations of market prices, including those beyond our experience, using artificial market simulations, and to discuss quantitatively how spreading of dark pools beyond our experience could affect market price formations using the artificial market simulations. In short, this study is the first study to comprehensively discuss how regulations and financial systems beyond our experience could affect price formations using the artificial market simulations.

An Asynchronous Double Auction Market to Study the Formation of Financial Bubbles and Crashes

“…This latter point is especially crucial nowadays that most transactions taking place on markets are, in fact, achieved by computerized trading agents whose rationality is, indeed, inferred from algorithms. In addition, as the previous studies evaluated the impact of regulation policies on financial markets by the artificial market model (see [33,41,44]), one interesting application of this work consists in testing and evaluating the impact of regulation policies on real markets.…”

Impact Analysis of Financial Regulation on Multi-Asset Markets Using Artificial Market Simulations

“…Their study was based on (Chiarella and Iori 2002), which presented stylized trader models including only fundamental, chartist, and noise factors. Mizuta et al (2016) tested the effect of tick size, i.e., the price unit for orders, which led to a discussion of tick-size devaluation in the Tokyo stock exchange. As a platform for artificial market simulation, Torii et al (2017) proposed the platform "Plham".…”

“…In this simulation, agents are constructed by imitating traders in the real financial market. In some previous work, such as Mizuta et al (2016); Torii et al (2015), this type of approach was used. In addition, Mizuta (2019) argued that artificial market simulation could contribute to the improvements of the structures or rules and regulations of financial markets.…”

Who gains and who loses on stock markets? Risk preferences and timing matter

“…This limitation is easily overcome using the empirical framework of Artificial Markets with virtual investors. Multi‐agent modeling is widely applied to financial market studies (Bajo et al 2017; Biondi & Righi, 2017; Jacobs et al 2010; Mizuta et al 2015; Veryzhenko et al 2017; Yang et al 2020), since these models are able to reflect the complexity and automation of financial markets. The idea of agent‐based simulations is to study complex systems by representing each of the microscopic elements or agents individually and by simulating the behavior of the entire system, keeping track of all the individual elements and their interactions over time.…”