1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1077(199804)13:3<199::aid-hup974>3.3.co;2-v
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Effects of physostigmine on scopolamine–induced changes in quantitative electroencephalogram and cognitive performance

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
7
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 8 publications

(12 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

1
11
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to effects on memory and learning, scopolamine also impaired sustained attention as evidenced by impairments in the Digit Vigilance task and psychomotor function as evidenced by impairments in SRT and CRT tasks. These findings are again consistent with previous studies showing deficits in sustained attention (Broks et al, 1988 ;Ebert et al, 1998 ;Wesnes and Revell, 1984 ;Wesnes and Warburton, 1983 ;Wesnes et al, 1988) and psychomotor performance (i.e. SRT and CRT) with scopolamine (Broks et al, 1988 ;Ebert et al, 1998 ;Flicker et al, 1990 ;Little et al, 1998 ;Mintzer and Griffiths, 2003 ;Nuotto, 1983 ;Wesnes et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Mecamylamine and scopolamine were chosen for this study, as they are the most selective antagonists available for human use, with high affinity for nicotinic and muscarinic receptors respectively (Brown, 1992 ;Varanda et al, 1985 ;Young et al, 2001). The doses of mecamylamine and scopolamine chosen for this study were based on (1) previous findings reporting cognitive impairments following mecamylamine doses ranging from 5 mg to 20 mg (Newhouse et al, 1992, Pickworth et al, 1997 and scopolamine doses ranging from 0.3 mg to 0.6 mg (Ebert et al, 1998 ;Wesnes et al, 1988) and (2) minimizing the chance of sedation interfering with task performance (especially in the MS condition).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…In addition to effects on memory and learning, scopolamine also impaired sustained attention as evidenced by impairments in the Digit Vigilance task and psychomotor function as evidenced by impairments in SRT and CRT tasks. These findings are again consistent with previous studies showing deficits in sustained attention (Broks et al, 1988 ;Ebert et al, 1998 ;Wesnes and Revell, 1984 ;Wesnes and Warburton, 1983 ;Wesnes et al, 1988) and psychomotor performance (i.e. SRT and CRT) with scopolamine (Broks et al, 1988 ;Ebert et al, 1998 ;Flicker et al, 1990 ;Little et al, 1998 ;Mintzer and Griffiths, 2003 ;Nuotto, 1983 ;Wesnes et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Mecamylamine and scopolamine were chosen for this study, as they are the most selective antagonists available for human use, with high affinity for nicotinic and muscarinic receptors respectively (Brown, 1992 ;Varanda et al, 1985 ;Young et al, 2001). The doses of mecamylamine and scopolamine chosen for this study were based on (1) previous findings reporting cognitive impairments following mecamylamine doses ranging from 5 mg to 20 mg (Newhouse et al, 1992, Pickworth et al, 1997 and scopolamine doses ranging from 0.3 mg to 0.6 mg (Ebert et al, 1998 ;Wesnes et al, 1988) and (2) minimizing the chance of sedation interfering with task performance (especially in the MS condition).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Investigations in young healthy volunteers who received scopolamine have been described to influence delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands in EEG. 7,8,[10][11][12][13] After both routes of administration of scopolamine, we observed a significant decrease in total power in the alpha frequency band in all electrode positions (central, frontal, occipital). The scopolamineinduced influence on delta and beta frequency bands observed could only be described as a trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In previous studies, scopolamine was usually administered subcutaneously. 6,9,10 In a recent study, we observed maximum scopolamine serum concentrations of 3.27, 8.99, and 18.81 ng/ml after subcutaneous injection of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mg scopolamine, respectively. 9 We also observed a large variability of the C max values after subcutaneous administration that could limit the application of the sigmoidal E max model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…[ 13] have shown a dose‐related increase in relative power in the 0.5–3.5 and 4.0–7.5 Hz spectral segments (delta and theta frequency bands) and a concomitant reduction in the relative power in the 8.0–13.5 Hz frequency band (part of the alpha and beta frequency bands). We also observed an increase in spectral power density in the delta frequency band (1.25–4.50 Hz) 1 h after subcutaneous administration of 0.6 mg of scopolamine compared with baseline [ 42]. In a recent study in young healthy male volunteers, an increase in spectral delta (1.25–4.50 Hz) and theta power density (4.75–6.75 Hz) and a decrease in spectral alpha 1 (7.00–9.50 Hz), alpha 2 (9.75–12.50 Hz), beta 1 (12.75–18.50 Hz) and beta 2 power density (18.75–35.00 Hz) were found in qEEG after subcutaneous administration of scopolamine compared with placebo [ 45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.