2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nutrition on the contents of fat, protein, somatic cells, aromatic compounds, and undesirable substances in sheep milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
114
2
22

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
15
114
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown increases in milk yield and reductions in milk protein when sheep diets are supplemented with fat or oil (Pulina et al, 2006). These changes can probably be explained by the greater energy content of the lipid-supplemented diets compared with the nonsupplemented ones, and the reduced amino-acid availability in the mammary gland.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have shown increases in milk yield and reductions in milk protein when sheep diets are supplemented with fat or oil (Pulina et al, 2006). These changes can probably be explained by the greater energy content of the lipid-supplemented diets compared with the nonsupplemented ones, and the reduced amino-acid availability in the mammary gland.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The pattern of protein concentration showed the well-known concentration effect associated with a reduction in milk yield (Pulina et al, 2006). The initial milk protein concentration was reached at the Re-Fed period.…”
Section: Milk Yield and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Indirect comparisons of changes in milk fat composition to diets of similar composition (Table 4) combined with comparisons of changes in milk fat secretion to rumen protected sources of trans-10, cis-12 CLA ( Figure 5) and the relationship between increases in trans-10 18:1 and changes in milk fat synthesis (Figure 7a) suggest that small ruminants differ from cows with respect to both ruminal lipid metabolism and the regulation of mammary lipogenesis. Ruminal biohydrogenation pathways appear to be more stable and robust to alterations due to diet in small ruminants compared with the cow that may reflect differences between species related to eating behavior, rumination, buffering of rumen pH, rumen digestion kinetics and transit rates (Chilliard et al, 2003;Pulina et al, 2006;Bernard et al, 2009c) resulting in less exposure of the mammary gland to TFA that may inhibit milk fat synthesis. This is supported by a recent experiment demonstrating that supplements of fish oil and soya bean oil (30 and 109 g/day) to goats grazing fresh grass enhanced milk fat content (mean response 8 g/kg) and milk trans-11 18:1 concentrations (mean response 11.9 g/100 g fatty acids) in the absence of large changes (mean response 0.9 g/100 g fatty acids) in milk trans-10 18:1 content (Gagliostro et al, 2009), whereas fish oil and sunflower oil causes MFD in lactating cows fed maize silage based diets and increases in milk fat trans-10 18:1 and trans-9, cis-11 CLA concentrations (Shingfield et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Role Of Ruminal Biohydrogenation On Mammary Lipogenesis In Smentioning
confidence: 99%