2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of low-dose X-ray medical diagnostics on female gonads: Insights from large animal oocytes and human ovaries as complementary models

Abstract: Diagnostic imaging has significantly grown over the last thirty years as indispensable support for diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic and monitoring procedures of human diseases. This study explored the effects of low-dose X-ray medical diagnostics exposure on female fertility. To aim this, cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) recovered from the ovaries of juvenile sheep and human ovaries were used as complementary models for in vitro studies. In the sheep model, the effects of low-dose X-rays on oocyte viability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the worst case in our study, the ipsilateral ovary received a dose of 30 cGy and the contralateral ovary 13 cGy. Considering the studies, it is not yet possible to talk about a safe threshold for ovaries, but it can be assumed that oocytes repair low-dose radiation damage [22]. When our all cases are evaluated collectively, it is seen that ovarian doses are within safe limits, especially for the contralateral ovary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the worst case in our study, the ipsilateral ovary received a dose of 30 cGy and the contralateral ovary 13 cGy. Considering the studies, it is not yet possible to talk about a safe threshold for ovaries, but it can be assumed that oocytes repair low-dose radiation damage [22]. When our all cases are evaluated collectively, it is seen that ovarian doses are within safe limits, especially for the contralateral ovary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%