2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of inertial and kinematic interaction on seismic behavior of pile with embedded foundation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in the case where the fundamental natural period of the superstructure is longer than that of the surface ground, the SRSS is appropriate. Although this general property is known partially in the practical design [6,8,9], more comprehensive investigation has been conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, in the case where the fundamental natural period of the superstructure is longer than that of the surface ground, the SRSS is appropriate. Although this general property is known partially in the practical design [6,8,9], more comprehensive investigation has been conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the evaluation of the bending moment in a pile, both the effect of the forced displacement of a free-field ground (action 1) and the effect of the inertial force from a superstructure (action 2) as shown in Fig.1 have to be taken into account in an appropriate manner (for example [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]). However these two effects have different characteristics and it seems difficult to include these in a simple way keeping a reasonable accuracy.…”
Section: Conventional Methods For Estimating Seismic Pile Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations