2015
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbv012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Individual Differences and Situational Features on Age Differences in Mindless Reading

Abstract: Our findings are discussed in terms of implications for age differences in lapses of attention during reading and predictors of mind-wandering generally.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported in a study by Shake et al (2015) in which age-related differences in MW were measured during reading of a narrative text (an autobiographical narrative) and an expository text (containing historical and factual descriptions). Both groups reported less MW in the narrative relative to the expository text, and this former text was also rated as less difficult to read and more interesting.…”
Section: Mind-wanderingsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar results were reported in a study by Shake et al (2015) in which age-related differences in MW were measured during reading of a narrative text (an autobiographical narrative) and an expository text (containing historical and factual descriptions). Both groups reported less MW in the narrative relative to the expository text, and this former text was also rated as less difficult to read and more interesting.…”
Section: Mind-wanderingsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Mirroring our findings, mind‐wandering frequency was not related with working memory spans. In a similar vein, Shake et al evaluated age‐related differences in mind wandering during the reading of texts . Older adults reported finding the texts more interesting than younger adults, and also reported less mind wandering compared with younger adults during texts reading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As people are mind-wandering about half the time in daily life [28], this yields ~2,000 self-generated thoughts each day [27]. Very young children likely lack the ability to form the kind of coherent, interiorized streams of thought that would allow for self-generated thought [25], and there is ample evidence that the frequency of self-generated thought declines somewhat in later life (e.g., [29]). But despite these periods at the dawn and dusk of life where self-generated thought is absent or curtailed, the output of the human mind over some 70 years of highly active thought-generation is staggering: some 50,000,000 self-generated thoughts.…”
Section: A Dual-process Model Of Mind-wandering: Generation and Evalumentioning
confidence: 99%