2013
DOI: 10.2981/12-027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour

Abstract: Predation risk may affect space use and foraging patterns of prey animals, with strong down-stream effects on diet composition and ecological interactions. Wild boar Sus scrofa is a notorious crop raider but also a popular game species, yet little is known about how risk perception of human hunting affects wild boar space use. We studied the effects of human hunting on the movement of GPS-collared female wild boar. We found that the hunting method affected whether the wild boar fled or hid. After fleeing into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
81
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Selective removal of individuals may change aspects of social organization and dispersal rates (Milner et al 2007;Allendorf and Hard 2009;Averbeck et al 2010;Borg et al 2015, Leclerc et al 2017, while hunting disturbance can induce escape movements and temporary home range displacement (Kamei et al 2010;Grignolio et al 2011;Thurfjell et al 2013;Jarnemo and Wikenros 2014). In the case of wild boar, repeated hunting disturbance may affect social structure, leading to an increase in fission-fusion dynamics in the population, potentially facilitating the spread of diseases (Iacolina et al 2009;Scillitani et al 2010;Saïd et al 2012).…”
Section: Hunting and Disease Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective removal of individuals may change aspects of social organization and dispersal rates (Milner et al 2007;Allendorf and Hard 2009;Averbeck et al 2010;Borg et al 2015, Leclerc et al 2017, while hunting disturbance can induce escape movements and temporary home range displacement (Kamei et al 2010;Grignolio et al 2011;Thurfjell et al 2013;Jarnemo and Wikenros 2014). In the case of wild boar, repeated hunting disturbance may affect social structure, leading to an increase in fission-fusion dynamics in the population, potentially facilitating the spread of diseases (Iacolina et al 2009;Scillitani et al 2010;Saïd et al 2012).…”
Section: Hunting and Disease Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dense stand A with a low shrub layer showed the highest impact of small mammals, while the stand C with a low density of mature trees and a rich undergrowth in the higher height/age classes (exceeding 50 cm) showed the highest impact by large animals. We assume that a shelter extends the duration of animal activities (Podgórski et al 2013, Thurfjell et al 2013. Therefore, the proportion of acorns consumed by ungulates in a safe place was significantly higher.…”
Section: Wild Boar Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, they move to forests where sufficient food sources and shelter are available (Frackowiak et al 2013). Indeed, animals with adequate food supplies do not migrate far from their resting places in search of uncertain sources (Massei et al 1997, Lemel et al 2003, and they move to more distant places only after the local food sources have been completely depleted (Thurfjell et al 2013). Therefore, their feeding behavior is conditioned by the distance from food sources, escape possibilities and cover opportunities (Spitz & Janeau 1995).…”
Section: Wild Boar Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has begun to analyse behavioural responses of wild ungulates to hunting pressure(Benhaiem et al, 2008;Lone, Loe, Meisingset, Stamnes, & Mysterud, 2015;Thurfjell, Spong, & Ericsson, 2013) and management practices(Ossi et al, 2017). Human presence and topography had also no apparent effect on roe deer expansion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%