Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs

Lovatto, Paulo Alberto; Sauvant, Daniel; Noblet, Jean; Dubois, Serge; Milgen, Jaap van

doi:10.2527/jas.2006-048

Cited by 49 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The decrease in ADFI and ADG as a consequence of feed restriction observed in this study has been previously reported (Lovatto et al, 2006;Pastorelli et al, 2012). However, the RE feeding regimen tended to improve feed efficiency.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Administration of a novel plant extract product via drinking water to post-weaning piglets: effects on performance and gut health

Bontempo

Jiang

Cheli

et al. 2014

Animal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study evaluated the effects of a novel plant extract (PE) product (Grazix TM ) on the performance and gut health of weaned piglets challenged with Escherichia coli. The PE was a standardised mixture of green tea leaves (Camellia sinensis) and pomegranate fruit (Punica granatum) obtained by using the LiveXtract TM process. A total of 144 piglets were weaned at 24 days and allocated to 8 for a 35-day experiment with a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design comparing different treatments (water without product (CT) or 8 μl/kg per day PE in drinking water (PE)), feeding regimens (ad libitum (AD) or restricted (RE)) and oral E. coli challenges on day 9 (sham (− ) or infected ( + )). There were six pens per group with three piglets per pen. On day 35, 24 of the RE feeding piglets were slaughtered. It was found that PE supplementation increased the average daily gain (ADG) from day 28 to day 35 ( P = 0.03) and increased the gain to feed ratio (G : F) from day 7 to day 14 ( P = 0.02). RE feeding led to lower feed intake in piglets during the 1 st week ( P < 0.01), 2 nd week ( P = 0.06), 3 rd week ( P = 0.05), and throughout the course of the overall study period ( P = 0.05). E. coli challenge decreased the ADG and G : F ratio from day 7 to day 14 ( P = 0.08 and < 0.01, respectively) and increased the faecal score (higher values indicate more severe diarrhoea) on days 14, 21, 28 and 35 ( P < 0.01). PE supplementation decreased the faecal score in the challenged piglets during the 1 st week post-challenge ( P < 0.01). E. coli challenge increased the faecal E. coli level on day 14 ( P = 0.03) and increased the Enterobacteriaceae level on day 35 ( P < 0.01). Reduced faecal E. coli was observed on days 14 and 35 ( P = 0.05 and 0.02, respectively), and reduced Enterobacteriaceae ( P < 0.01) was found on day 35 in the PE animals. RE feeding increased the faecal Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli levels on day 35 ( P = 0.02, < 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively). These results suggest that PE supplementation may improve the gut health status of post-weaning piglets and counteract some of the negative effects that occur when piglets are challenged with E. coli.Keywords: Escherichia coli, gut health, performance, piglet, plant extract ImplicationsThis study investigated the effects of a novel plant extract product that was added to the drinking water for weaned piglets. Different feeding regimens were tested, and the effects of the extract on growth performance, gut health and protection against Escherichia coli challenge were observed. The results showed that the plant extract may represent a useful additive for improving gut health and microbial ecology and reducing the severity of an E. coli challenge. The results may have a significant impact on nutritional management in conventional farms. Use of the plant extract could enable piglets to better withstand the infections that are often associated with weaning.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Administration of a novel plant extract product via drinking water to post-weaning piglets: effects on performance and gut health

Bontempo

Jiang

Cheli

et al. 2014

Animal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In cockerels and hens, restricted feeding decreased fasting and fed heat productions and maintenance energy requirement (MacLeod et al, 1979). In pigs, feed restriction decreased the total and resting heat production, as well as the short-term thermic effect of feeding compared with ad libitum feeding (Lovatto et al, 2006). In pigeons, when food was consumed ad libitum, low-amplitude daily cycles in metabolic rates and body temperatures occurred.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of feeding time and time-restricted feeding on the fattening traits of White Roman geese

Chen

et al. 2014

Animal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study comprises two trials that investigated the effects of feeding time and time-restricted feeding on the fattening traits and plasma metabolite levels of White Roman geese. In Trial I, 24 geese aged 8 weeks of each sex were allowed free access to a fattening diet for 1 h either in the morning (morning-feeding group) or afternoon (afternoon-feeding group). At 12 weeks of age, blood samples were collected hourly for 4 h, beginning 1 h after feeding to determine the plasma levels of glucose, triacylglycerols and uric acid. The results showed a lower ( P < 0.05) daily feed intake (DFI) and daily gain (DG) and higher ( P < 0.05) feed efficiency (FE) for the morning-feeding group compared with those of the afternoon-feeding group. In addition, the postprandial plasma levels of glucose, triacylglycerols and uric acid did not differ ( P > 0.05) between groups. In Trial II, 12 geese aged 8 weeks of each sex were randomly assigned to either the ad libitum feeding group (control group) or time-restricted feeding group (restricted group). The geese in the control group were fed a fattening diet ad libitum, whereas those in the restricted group were allowed access to the diet for 2 h every morning. All geese were killed at 13 weeks of age and their carcass traits were evaluated. The results showed a lower DFI and DG and higher FE for the restricted group compared with those of the control group ( P < 0.05). In addition, the restricted group exhibited lower visceral and abdominal fat and higher empty digestive tract and liver weights than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The results showed that time-restricted feeding in the morning resulted in superior DG and FE compared with feeding in the afternoon. Moreover, time-restricted feeding implemented in the morning during the fattening period reduced DFI and increased FE in geese compared with ad libitum feeding.

show abstract

“…The effects of feed restriction have been broadly studied in pigs (Lovatto et al, 2006), poultry (Tumova et al, 2002) and even in human beings (Polivy, 1996). Indeed, feed restriction has frequently been suggested as a strategy to improve feed effi ciency either in broiler chickens (Lee and Leeson, 2001) or turkeys (Skrivan and Tumova, 1995) and, in recent years, as a means to reduce mortality in intensive rearing of chickens (Acar et al, 1995;Lippens et al, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of early feed restriction on performance and health status in growing rabbits slaughtered at 2 kg live-weight

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:The effect of a time-limited access to the feeders (8 h per d from 9:30 to 17:30) on fattening performance and health status was studied in rabbits reared until 2 kg live-weight as typical in the Spanish market. For this purpose, the same diet (10.5 MJ digestible energy/kg, 38.9% neutral detergent fi bre and 18.4% crude protein on dry matter basis) was used over two consecutive trials. A total of 192 growing rabbits (96 in each trial) were weaned at 35 d and assigned to 2 different feeding treatments (continuously fed ad libitum or restricted from 35 until 49 d). In the fi rst trial, feed restriction reduced daily feed intake (94.3 vs. 74.2 g; P<0.001), daily weight gain (43.6 vs. 27.1 g; P<0.001) and impaired feed conversion rate (FCR) (2.28 vs. 2.92, P<0.001) in the fi rst 14 d after weaning. Later on, no feed restriction was applied and a compensatory growth was observed in previously restricted rabbits (44.8 vs. 54.8 g/d; P<0.001). Early restricted rabbits did not reach the Spanish commercial weight (2 kg) at 63 d of age and weighed less than full-fed rabbits (1989 vs. 1888 g; P=0.001). Moreover, feed restriction did not improve FCR in the whole fattening period (2.56 on average). The second trial was extended until 70 d to permit restricted rabbits to attain market weight. However, at that age, live weight of restricted rabbits was also lower than that of rabbits always fed ad libitum (2285 vs. 2101 g; P=0.001). In the fi rst trial, no health problem was recorded (average mortality 1.04%) whereas in the second trial feed restriction allowed both mortality (25.6 vs. 6.34%, P=0.017) and morbidity (41.4 vs. 12.7%, P=0.004) to decrease. The higher number of losses in the second trial made economic FCR differ from scientifi c FCR (3.63 vs. 2.89, on average) in the 35-70 d period. Moreover, morbidity increased heterogeneity of fattening performance. In conclusion, the interest of feed restriction in Spanish fattening rabbit farms is mitigated by the conventional market weight. Nevertheless, in a context with high rates of digestive troubles, a time-limited access to the feeder enhances health status on the farm and could justify the short delay necessary to reach slaughter weight.

show abstract

Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs

Cited by 49 publications

References 32 publications

Administration of a novel plant extract product via drinking water to post-weaning piglets: effects on performance and gut health

Administration of a novel plant extract product via drinking water to post-weaning piglets: effects on performance and gut health

The effects of feeding time and time-restricted feeding on the fattening traits of White Roman geese

Effect of early feed restriction on performance and health status in growing rabbits slaughtered at 2 kg live-weight

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About