Effects of errors in basal area and mean diameter on the optimality of forest management prescriptions

Abstract

• Key message Errors in forest stand attributes can lead to sub-optimal management prescriptions concerning the set management objectives. When the objective is net present value, errors in mean diameter result in greater losses than similar errors in basal area, and underestimation greater losses than overestimation. • Context Errors in forest inventory data can cause inoptimality losses in the objectives set to forest management. Losses occur when the forest is treated with management prescriptions that are optimal for erroneous data but not for correct data. • Aims We evaluate the effect of varying levels of errors in basal area and mean diameter on the inoptimality losses. • Methods Errors from 20% of overestimation to 20% of underestimation were simulated in basal area and mean diameter. For each stand, the management prescription that maximized the net present value was selected with and without errors. The inoptimality losses were calculated for different error levels. • Results The tested error levels resulted in inoptimality losses of 0.11–3.01%. Errors in mean diameter increased inoptimality losses more than similar relative errors in basal area. Simultaneous underestimation of basal area and mean diameter led to greater inoptimality losses than simultaneous overestimation of these attributes. • Conclusion If the forest is considered as an investment, using inventory data where basal area and mean diameter are underestimated causes greater losses compared with data where these attributes are overestimated. Errors in mean diameter are more important than similar errors in the basal area. Large errors in basal area and mean diameter should be avoided especially in stands where the basal area is high.

Land Use Land/Cover Change Reduces Woody Plant Diversity and Carbon Stocks in a Lowland Coastal Forest Ecosystem, Tanzania

“…The higher the IVI, the more influential the plant is for the community, and its loss would present more significant damage [66]. We also estimated stem basal area based on diameter at breast height (DBH) as a measure of tree density [71].…”

Assessing and mitigating systematic errors in forest attribute maps utilizing harvester and airborne laser scanning data

“…These synthetic estimates, also known as "pixel-counting" estimates (Waldner and Defourny 2017), may, however, hold systematic errors, if the model underlying the map is insufficient (Breidenbach et al 2021a;Palahí et al 2021). Systematic errors in estimates hamper decision making aiming at the optimal planning and management of forest resources (Ruotsalainen et al 2021).…”

Implications of incorrectly determining site index on stand-level management activities and financial returns in older generation loblolly pine plantations

“…For this purpose, inaccurate projections of growth and yield are certainly not desired. However, since we never know the true growth and yield of plantations when projections are being made, if these errors do not lead to substantial differences in what is considered to be the optimal silvicultural practice, the predictive errors are actually of little consequence (Kangas et al 2011;Ruotsalainen et al 2021). Site index, or a measure of site quality, is commonly used as a driver in stand-level growth and yield projection models.…”