1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90422-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers: Part II—Report of survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the introduction of silicone elastomer by Barnhart in 1960, it has been widely used as the material of choice for fabricating maxillofacial prosthesis because of its chemical inertness, durability, ease of manipulation and biocompatibility [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of silicone elastomer by Barnhart in 1960, it has been widely used as the material of choice for fabricating maxillofacial prosthesis because of its chemical inertness, durability, ease of manipulation and biocompatibility [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For manufacturing maxillofacial prosthesis silicone elastomer has been utilized as the material of decision since the introduction of it by Barnhart in 1960, because of its chemical inertness, durability, ease of manipulation and biocompatibility (4,5,6) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual method did not reveal any significant colour alteration. This result demonstrated that the materials presented satisfactory colour stability and may be indicated for clinical use [15,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%