Effects of demand-side restrictions on high-deforestation palm oil in Europe on deforestation and emissions in Indonesia

Abstract

Demand-side restrictions on high-deforestation commodities are expanding as a climate policy, but their impact on reducing tropical deforestation and emissions has yet to be quantified. Here we model the effects of demand-side restrictions on high-deforestation palm oil in Europe on deforestation and emissions in Indonesia. We do so by integrating a model of global trade with a spatially explicit model of land-use change in Indonesia. We estimate a European ban on high-deforestation palm oil from 2000–2015 would have led to a 8.9% global price premium on low-deforestation palm oil, resulting in 21,374 ha/yr (1.60%) less deforestation and 21.1 million tCO2/yr (1.91%) less emissions from deforestation in Indonesia relative to what occurred. A hypothetical Indonesia-wide carbon price would have achieved equivalent emission reductions at $0.81/tCO2. Impacts of a ban are small because: 52% of Europe’s imports of high-deforestation palm oil would have shifted to non-participating countries; the price elasticity of supply of high-deforestation oil palm cropland is small (0.13); and conversion to oil palm was responsible for only 32% of deforestation in Indonesia. If demand-side restrictions succeed in substantially reducing deforestation, it is likely to be through non-price pathways.

Survey of nonconventional yeasts for lipid and hydrocarbon biotechnology

“…For example, microbial processes are being used to address environmental and societal problems in the palm oil industry. Palm oil is commonly used in household products, but the harvesting of palm oil trees has caused massive deforestation and societal consequences (Busch et al, 2022 ; Kadandale et al, 2019 ).The ongoing development of microbial processes to produce palm oil provides a preferable source of these molecules (Abeln & Chuck, 2021 ; Whiffin et al, 2016 ).…”

The future of meat and dairy consumption in the UK: exploring different policy scenarios to meet net zero targets and improve population health

“…Therefore, it is possible that reduced meat consumption and production can have positive spill-overs in other countries through reduced demand for feed crop production overseas. A lot of processed food uses palm oil, which is entirely produced overseas, typically with large environmental impacts (Busch & Austin, 2022). If processed mat alternatives contain palm oil this could affect the environmental footprint of the UK abroad.…”

Oil palm and rubber-driven deforestation in Indonesia and Malaysia (2000-2021) and efforts toward zero deforestation commitments

“…Meanwhile, consumers in the European Union, for example, demand palm oil products from Indonesia and Malaysia that are free from deforestation(Gaveau et al 2018), which burden these countries to ensure deforestation-free export commodities. However, recent research has suggested that banning imports from the European Union of deforestation-free commodities may have a much less signi cant impact on preventing forest loss than was originally expected(Busch et al 2022). Following that, Indonesian palm oil companies began exporting palm oil to China without NDPE commitments.…”