1992
DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.32.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cyclic Loading on Undrained Strength and Compressibility of Clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interesting approach to the issue was presented in the work of Yashuara et al [28], where it was stated that in the case of normally consolidated soils subjected to cyclic loading in undrained conditions pore water pressure is generated, which causes a decrease in effective stress. Stress path is moving towards the critical state line CSL.…”
Section: Behaviour Of Cohesive Soil Subjected To Cyclic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interesting approach to the issue was presented in the work of Yashuara et al [28], where it was stated that in the case of normally consolidated soils subjected to cyclic loading in undrained conditions pore water pressure is generated, which causes a decrease in effective stress. Stress path is moving towards the critical state line CSL.…”
Section: Behaviour Of Cohesive Soil Subjected To Cyclic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slightly different observations are contained in the publications of Matsui et al [16] and also Procter and Khaffaf [18], where no visible effects of frequency on soil behaviour under cyclic loading has been observed. Yasuhara et al [28] state that there is no apparent effect of frequency on shear strength of soil subjected to cyclic loading in undrained conditions.…”
Section: Behaviour Of Cohesive Soil Subjected To Cyclic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For saturated sands, the problems regarding the cyclic shear-induced pore water pressure and settlement, and the effect of cyclic shear direction on their dynamic properties have been extensively studied by a number of researches (Pyke et al 1975;Ishihara and Yamazaki 1980;Tokimatsu and Yoshimi 1982;Ishihara and Yoshimine 1992;Talaganov 1996;Matsuda et al 2004Matsuda et al , 2011 and taken into account for a long time (Japan Road Association 2002). When comparing the earthquake resistance of saturated clay with sand, soft cohesive soils are believed to be relatively stable because no liquefaction takes place even under strong motion by earthquakes (Hyodo et al 1994(Hyodo et al , 1999Yasuhara et al 1992Yasuhara et al , 2001) and consequently, studies on the earthquake-induced pore water pressure and post-earthquake settlement of clay and sand are in different situations (Matasovic and Vucetic 1992;Yildirim and Ersan 2007), due to which the influence of the cyclic shear direction on the dynamic properties of clays has just been firstly mentioned by DeGroot et al (1996) and observed for Kaolinite clay by Matsuda et al (2013a, b). In addition, since the effects of relative movements of soil particle on the complex pore water pressure response are still insufficiently clarified, the so-called curve-fitting method is an appropriate approach for effective modelling of the pore water pressure accumulation and several models have been proposed for the case of strain-controlled cyclic shear e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Yasuhara et al (2001) proposed a design methodology for the assessment of post-cyclic volumetric settlements (i.e. strains) based on the early findings of Yasuhara's research teams (Yasuhara and Andersen 1991;Yasuhara et al 1992;Yasuhara and Hyde 1997). As an input requirement of the methodology, the estimation of excess pore pressure is required, and authors recommended 2-D or 3-D dynamic numerical analysis for the determination of excess pore water pressure distribution within the soil media.…”
Section: Seismic Deformation Response Of Silt and Claymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the practical value of both r u and also ε v,pc models significantly. Yasuhara et al (1992) has performed an experimental study and stated that the ratio of C dyn to C s was approximately equal to 1.5. Unfortunately, pore pressure generation response and corollary issues were not addressed by the researchers.…”
Section: Seismic Deformation Response Of Silt and Claymentioning
confidence: 99%