2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of chromium on activated sludge and on the performance of wastewater treatment plants: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…to the loading of Cd and Cr in wastewater, and consequently in sludge, could not be neglected [1,6,10]. Cr(VI) could originate in urban sludge from tap water (groundwater contaminated from industrial processes), drinking water distribution system from corrosion inhibitors used in water pipes and products containing chromates and dichromates [40,41].…”
Section: Temporal Variations Of Sludge Metal Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to the loading of Cd and Cr in wastewater, and consequently in sludge, could not be neglected [1,6,10]. Cr(VI) could originate in urban sludge from tap water (groundwater contaminated from industrial processes), drinking water distribution system from corrosion inhibitors used in water pipes and products containing chromates and dichromates [40,41].…”
Section: Temporal Variations Of Sludge Metal Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromium (Cr) is a common heavy metal contaminant widely derived from smelting, electroplating, leather tanning, and chemical manufacturing, and is highly toxic for organisms [6]. Therefore, the presence of Cr in wastewater could negatively affect microbial activities and microbial community structures, as well as the performance of biological treatment systems [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cr(VI) is the most toxic among chromium species, and can easily penetrate cells and react with intracellular substances to affect the activity of microorganisms [8]. The biological treatment system of WWTPs is vulnerable to wastewater containing Cr(VI), resulting in the effluent quality not meeting the discharge standard [7]. It has been Water 2017, 9, 909 2 of 11 reported that nitrifying bacteria was more sensitive than heterotrophic bacteria to the toxicity of Cr(VI), and a Cr(VI) concentration of 0.5 mg L −1 caused significant inhibition of the nitrification process (up to 74% decrease in ammonia removal efficiency) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although biochemical reaction rates may roughly double with temperature increase by 10 °C (Rittman and McCarty 2001), microorganisms function at an optimum performance at a specific temperature range (Prescott et al, 2002). Temperature has been shown to affect the reduction rate of Cr(VI) (and hence chromium toxicity to Escherichia coli (Shen and Wang, 1994)), while in general, the optimum Cr(VI) resistance and reduction in microorganisms has been determined to be between 30-36 °C (Shen and Wang, 1994;Ishibachi et al, 1990;Wang and Xiao, 1995;Krauter et al, 1996;Vaiopoulou and Gikas 2012). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals has been determined to maximize at 25 °C and 30 °C for Cu(II) and Cd(II), respectively, by Pseudomonas putida (Uslu et al, 2011) and at 30 °C, 25 °C and 30 °C for Cd(II), Pb(II) and Cu(II), respectively, by Rhizophus arrhizus (Uslu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%