2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00841-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of charge sharing in 3-D position sensitive CdZnTe gamma-ray spectrometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies have been done by other groups with pixel detectors. Du et al [6] and He et al [7] investigated charge charing in 3-D position sensitive CdZnTe spectrometers and obtained sizes of electron clouds for different gamma-ray sources. Bolotnikov et al [8] studied the charge loss to inter-pixel gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies have been done by other groups with pixel detectors. Du et al [6] and He et al [7] investigated charge charing in 3-D position sensitive CdZnTe spectrometers and obtained sizes of electron clouds for different gamma-ray sources. Bolotnikov et al [8] studied the charge loss to inter-pixel gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, significant charge sharing was reported in CdZnTe pixel (Gaskin et al 2003, He et al 2000) and strip detectors (Kalemci and Matteson 2002) with pitches, crystal thicknesses and bias voltages similar to the photon-counting detector used in this study. On the other hand, significant charge sharing was also observed in a CdTe pixel detector with a 55 µm pitch (Maiorino et al 2006, Pennicard et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Alternatively, sophisticated processing of events that involve multiple anode pixels may allow one to utilize all events detected by small anode pixel CdZnTe detectors for imaging purposes. Although the characteristics of the CdZnTe detectors have been widely investigated over the last decade (Bolotnikov et al 1999, He et al 2000, Meng and He 2005), little has been reported about CdZnTe as a PET detector (Vaska et al 2007, Gu et al 2011) and we did not find any publication about a CdZnTe PET detector with anode pixel size less than 0.5 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%