1984
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cAMP on single cell motility in Dictyostelium.

Abstract: The motility of individual, aggregation-competent amebae of Dictyostelium has been analyzed at different concentrations of cAMP under both nongradient and gradient conditions. The following is demonstrated: (a) concentrations of cAMP >10 -a M inhibit motility in a concentrationdependent fashion, decrease the frequency but not the degree of turning, and cause rounding in cell shape; (b) no concentration of cAMP stimulates motility, or positive chemokinesis; (c) concentrations of cAMP that stimulate a maximal ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
88
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test whether pkaR mutant cells respond normally to the temporal and concentration components of a natural wave, they were challenged with four temporal waves of cAMP generated under conditions in which spatial gradients of cAMP were not established. As previously reported (35,36,40,47,48), wild-type cells did not respond to the first wave but then exhibited an increase in velocity in the front and a decrease in velocity at the peak and in the back of each of the three subsequent waves (Fig. 5A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To test whether pkaR mutant cells respond normally to the temporal and concentration components of a natural wave, they were challenged with four temporal waves of cAMP generated under conditions in which spatial gradients of cAMP were not established. As previously reported (35,36,40,47,48), wild-type cells did not respond to the first wave but then exhibited an increase in velocity in the front and a decrease in velocity at the peak and in the back of each of the three subsequent waves (Fig. 5A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…To test whether pkaR mutant cells can assess and crawl in a directed fashion up a steep spatial gradient of cAMP, the presumed mechanism for establishing directionality in the front of a wave, cell behavior in a spatial gradient of cAMP generated in a gradient chamber (36,49) was analyzed by using 2D-DIAS software. pkaR mutant cells were capable of positive chemotaxis, as evidenced by positive average chemotactic indices above ϩ0.10 (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1G-L) indicative of rapidly translocating wild type AX3 amoebae (Fig. 1A-F) [Varnum and Soll, 1984;Wessels et al, 1989;Soll et al, 19901. Anterior and lateral pseudopodia formed by DMIB -amoebae contained nonparticulatc cytoplasm ( Fig.…”
Section: Cellular Morphology and Motility In The Absence Of Chemoattrmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cultures were incubated at 22°C in a humidity chamber. Cells were harvested for experimental purposes at the onset of aggregation, when motility and responsiveness to cAMP are at peak values [Varnum and Soll, 1984;Varnum et al, 19851. In the case of the parental and mutant strains studied here, the onset of aggregation was 7 and 9 h, respectively. initial appearance whether or not it continued to expand; or 2) if the expansion zone was less than 3.5% of the total cell area, but continued to expand into an elongate extension.…”
Section: Generating Aggregation-competent Amoebaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Sykes-Moore perfusion chamber (Bellco Glass) was used to analyze cell behavior in the absence of chemoattractant, as described (45). Cells adhered to a 25-mm glass coverslip inside the chamber were perfused with LPS at a rate that turned over one chamber volume-equivalent every 15 s. Behavior of cells in a spatial gradient of cAMP was analyzed in a Plexiglass chamber designed after that of Zigmond (46,47). LPS alone was added to one trough; LPS containing 1 μM cAMP was added to the other trough and cells were recorded after 10 to 15 min in the chamber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%