1986
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1110083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of an LH-releasing hormone antagonist on the secretion of LH, FSH, prolactin and ovarian steroids at different stages of the luteal phase in the stumptailed macaque (Macaca arctoides)

Abstract: The role of the pituitary gonadotrophins in controlling luteal function in the stumptailed macaque has been investigated by examining profiles of serum concentrations of LH, FSH, progesterone and oestradiol in daily blood samples from 13 monkeys during the menstrual cycle, and in blood samples taken at hourly intervals between 09.00 and 21.00 h on different days of the luteal phase in 13 cycles. The effects of acute withdrawal of gonadotrophins was investigated by administering a single injection of 300 microg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, while treatment with GnRH antagonist inhibits gonadotrophin secretion this may have little effect on the ability of hypoxia and local paracrine mechanisms to mediate or modulate VEGF action in the ovarian follicle, as these compensatory mechanisms may be allowed to function. It follows that the reason that GnRH antagonist treatment is more effective in suppressing early luteal angiogenesis ) is likely to be because the corpus luteum is heavily dependent upon LH (Fraser et al 1986). This dependence would include the local compensatory mechanisms that are relatively gonadotrophin independent in the developing follicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, while treatment with GnRH antagonist inhibits gonadotrophin secretion this may have little effect on the ability of hypoxia and local paracrine mechanisms to mediate or modulate VEGF action in the ovarian follicle, as these compensatory mechanisms may be allowed to function. It follows that the reason that GnRH antagonist treatment is more effective in suppressing early luteal angiogenesis ) is likely to be because the corpus luteum is heavily dependent upon LH (Fraser et al 1986). This dependence would include the local compensatory mechanisms that are relatively gonadotrophin independent in the developing follicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 6 animals were treated with the LHRH antagonist, at a dose of 300 pg/kg, on two separate occasions. This dose was selected on the basis of previous studies in stump-tailed and crab-eating macaques (Adams et al, 1986;Fraser et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LH was determined using an in-vitro bioassay based on the production of testosterone by dispersed mouse Leydig cells as described previously (Fraser et al, 1986). Sensitivity of the assay was 2 ng LH/ml using the rhesus monkey pituitary standard RP-1, supplied by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that LH is the major luteotrophic factor regulating the function of the primate CL. Withdrawal of LH by GnRH antagonist administration results in luteolysis of the CL in the Old World primate (2), New World primate (3), and women (4), as reflected by decreased plasma progesterone levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%