2019
DOI: 10.1111/are.14332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of anEnterococcus faecium‐based probiotic on growth performance and health of Pirarucu,Arapaima gigas

Abstract: Intensive fish farming has resulted in an increased concern for disease outbreaks. Probiotic use is one of the strategies being developed to improve fish health and productivity. Measures of probiotic colonization, growth performance, haematological characteristics and parasite load were used to evaluate the effect of diets supplemented with Enterococcus faecium on growth and health of Arapaima gigas juveniles. A completely randomized design with four treatments (diet with E. faecium at 1 × 106 CFU/g and 1 × 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, B. subtilis SJ-10 was isolated from a Korean traditional fermented fish (5 fish), Jeotgal [ 18 ] and the probiotic bacteria was inoculated on LB agar at single colony and then the bacteria was transferred to a production medium at 37 °C with incubation for 16 h in a vibrating incubator (HB 201SF; Hanbaek Scientific Co., Seoul, Rep. of Korea). On the other hand, E. faecium was collected from the anterior intestine of healthy Nile tilapia (7 fish) and identified as described previously [ 29 ]. Briefly, the E. faecium was grown in de Man, Rogosa & Sharpe (MRS) broth at 36 °C for 48 h [ 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, B. subtilis SJ-10 was isolated from a Korean traditional fermented fish (5 fish), Jeotgal [ 18 ] and the probiotic bacteria was inoculated on LB agar at single colony and then the bacteria was transferred to a production medium at 37 °C with incubation for 16 h in a vibrating incubator (HB 201SF; Hanbaek Scientific Co., Seoul, Rep. of Korea). On the other hand, E. faecium was collected from the anterior intestine of healthy Nile tilapia (7 fish) and identified as described previously [ 29 ]. Briefly, the E. faecium was grown in de Man, Rogosa & Sharpe (MRS) broth at 36 °C for 48 h [ 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viable number of bacterial colonies in 1 mL of aliquots was also counted using a colony counter (Suntex automatic colony counter, Taiwan) on the solid medium for establishing the growth curve of the bacterial colonies. All the live probiotic bacterial colonies were cleaned with sterile saline water and the amounts of the bacterial cells in sterile solution was adjusted at 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 8 and 1 × 10 7 CFU (colony forming unit)/g diets for B. subtilis WB60 [ 17 ], B. subtilis SJ-10 based on [ 18 ], and E. faecium SH30 [ 29 ], respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study has shown the effect of E. faecium in increasing host gut weight in honey bees by regulating development-associated genes. However, as E. faecium is used in a wide variety of settings, including swine [27], chicken [26], and fish [28] production for human consumption, the safety concern of E. faecium cannot be ignored. Certain E. faecium strains cause bacteremia, endocarditis, and other infections [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although E. faecium strains isolated from hospitals and others from diseased animals have been considered as opportunistic pathogens with strong antibiotic resistance [24], other strains of E. faecium have been widely used as probiotics in animal breeding. E. faecium has shown varied probiotic effects in different animals, including improving nutrient metabolism [25] and modulating the gut barrier in broiler chickens [26], reducing infection in swine [27], improving growth in fish [28], and protecting honey bees from AFB [7]. However, the molecular interactions at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels between probiotic E. faecium and animals remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%