Effects of an external pneumatic compression device vs static compression garment on peripheral circulation and markers of sports performance and recovery

Blumkaitis, Julia C.; Moon, Jessica M.; Ratliff, Kayla M.; Stecker, Richard A.; Richmond, Scott R.; Sunderland, Kyle L.; Kerksick, Chad M.; Martin, Jeffrey S.; Mumford, Petey W.

doi:10.1007/s00421-022-04953-z

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While a plethora of studies have come out in the last 5 years on this technique, there have yet to be any systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Similar to compression garments, the majority of studies on recovery boots or sleeves report acute benefits to perceived muscle soreness, fatigue, and recovery, with mixed findings on the actual benefit to athletic performance [72][73][74]. As such, based on the current level of evidence, it may be more feasible and cost-effective to use other recovery strategies (e.g., compression garments) for similar recovery outcomes rather than recovery boots/sleeves.…”

Section: Recovery Boots/sleevesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fundamentals or Icing on Top of the Cake? A Narrative Review of Recovery Strategies and Devices for Athletes

Driller,

Leabeater

2023

Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The sport and athletic performance industry has seen a plethora of new recovery devices and technologies over recent years, and it has become somewhat difficult for athletes, coaches, and practitioners to navigate the efficacy of such devices or whether they are even required at all. With the increase in recovery devices and tools, it has also become commonplace for athletes to overlook more traditional, well-established recovery strategies. In this narrative review, we discuss recovery strategies in relation to the hierarchy of scientific evidence, classifying them based on the strength of the evidence, ranging from meta-analyses through to case studies and reports. We report that foam rolling, compression garments, cryotherapy, photobiomodulation, hydrotherapy, and active recovery have a high level of positive evidence for improved recovery outcomes, while sauna, recovery boots/sleeves, occlusion cuffs, and massage guns currently have a lower level of evidence and mixed results for their efficacy. Finally, we provide guidance for practitioners when deciding on recovery strategies to use with athletes during different phases of the season.

show abstract

Section: Recovery Boots/sleevesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fundamentals or Icing on Top of the Cake? A Narrative Review of Recovery Strategies and Devices for Athletes

Driller,

Leabeater

2023

Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The clinical device efficiency has been reported by a number of studies in the fields of vascular surgery, dermatologic surgery, and sport medicine [7]. There is agreement that IPC pressure is dissipated when applied to tissue.…”

mentioning

confidence: 93%

Modifications of Lower Limbs Central and Peripheral Hemodynamics Due to Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Effects

Palamarchuk¹,

Shesterina²

2023

Věda a perspektivy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High prevalence of cardiovascular diseases [1] implies continuous improvement of noninvasive physical techniques particularly perfectioning of compression therapy techniques [2]. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) widely used thought multipurpose physical rehabilitation in vascular surgery, dermatologic surgery, and sport medicine (Wesley C. et al. 2015). Compression therapy (CT) is an established treatment method with very low rate of complications in research various facets of vascular and skeletal muscle physiology [3]. However, despite the widely accepted usage of IPC, the exact consensus on the IPC pressure and time parameters is not established yet. The study was aimed to evaluate hemodynamic effects of intermittent pneumatic compression on the lower extremities and identify most effectiveness external pressure parameter and optimal procedure timing. The study was included healthy 30 volunteers, 17+ years of age. Vascular assessment included determination of the resting ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) and entered into intermittent pneumatic pressure correction program. According of ABI pressures of 40, 80, and 100 mmHg, and the procedure time limit at 20 minutes were applied. Outcome was considered succeed if blood pressure was

show abstract

Effects of an external pneumatic compression device vs static compression garment on peripheral circulation and markers of sports performance and recovery

Cited by 2 publications

References 31 publications

Fundamentals or Icing on Top of the Cake? A Narrative Review of Recovery Strategies and Devices for Athletes

Fundamentals or Icing on Top of the Cake? A Narrative Review of Recovery Strategies and Devices for Athletes

Modifications of Lower Limbs Central and Peripheral Hemodynamics Due to Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Effects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About