2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of amendments on soil availability and phytoremediation potential of aged p,p′-DDT, p,p′-DDE and p,p′-DDD residues by willow plants (Salix sp.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil DDTs levels increased from 518 ng g −1 dw (day 1) to 1143 and 823 ng g −1 dw at 15 and 60 days, respectively. Pollutant enhancement by watering regimen in this soil was previously reported by Mitton et al (2012) and this behavior was also informed for other soils and compounds (White et al, 1998;Kottler et al, 2001). The reason for the changes associated with the additions and losses of water from soil are uncertain.…”
Section: Unplanted Potssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Soil DDTs levels increased from 518 ng g −1 dw (day 1) to 1143 and 823 ng g −1 dw at 15 and 60 days, respectively. Pollutant enhancement by watering regimen in this soil was previously reported by Mitton et al (2012) and this behavior was also informed for other soils and compounds (White et al, 1998;Kottler et al, 2001). The reason for the changes associated with the additions and losses of water from soil are uncertain.…”
Section: Unplanted Potssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This could be explained by a specific root exudates production having a specific Pb mobilizer effect, which could favor Pb soil desorption favored by biochar addition (Kidd et al, 2009), since studies have shown that root exudates may differ among species (Kidd et al, 2009) and among amendments used (Mitton et al, 2012). …”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the removal of azoxystrobin from the soil, five treatments were performed in this experiment, and each treatment consisted of five replicates: (1) azoxystrobincontaminated soil without plants, (2) azoxystrobin-contaminated soil with P. major only (each pot contained one seedling of P. major), (3) azoxystrobin-contaminated soil with H. annus seedling (each pot contained twenty seedling of H. annus), (4) azoxystrobin-contaminated soil with soybean plants (each pot contained twenty seedling of G. max) and (5) azoxystrobin-contaminated soil with P. major and amended with polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80) at 9.2 mg/L, corresponding to 0.5 critical micelle concentration (CMC), where the CMC of Tween 80 was determined as 13-45 mg/L (Edwards et al 1991;Mitton et al 2012) (each pot contained one seedling of P. major). A whole-plant uptake experiment was performed on soil in a pot experiment for 14-day exposure.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tween 80 amendment caused a depletion on p,p_-DDT desorption from soils in willow plants, Salix sp. (Mitton et al 2012). The magnitude of pesticide desorption is dependent on surfactant and pesticide concentration (González et al 2006).…”
Section: Kinetics Of Pesticide Removalsmentioning
confidence: 99%