2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a dexamethasone-releasing implant on cochleae: A functional, morphological and pharmacokinetic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of Bas et al (45) for the implanted 1% loaded rods, the protective effect on hearing thresholds was unchanged through the end of the 13 week observation period. In the study of Liu et al (55) using a 2% load, protection of hearing thresholds appeared to start to deteriorate at 16 weeks after implantation although ABR thresholds were still significantly different between treatment and control group after 24 weeks. Stathopoulos et al (42) found no difference between two guinea pig groups implanted with either a control electrode dummy or a dexamethasone-eluting dummy in terms of spiral ganglia density, organ of Corti integrity, or fibrosis and ossification at 12 weeks after implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study of Bas et al (45) for the implanted 1% loaded rods, the protective effect on hearing thresholds was unchanged through the end of the 13 week observation period. In the study of Liu et al (55) using a 2% load, protection of hearing thresholds appeared to start to deteriorate at 16 weeks after implantation although ABR thresholds were still significantly different between treatment and control group after 24 weeks. Stathopoulos et al (42) found no difference between two guinea pig groups implanted with either a control electrode dummy or a dexamethasone-eluting dummy in terms of spiral ganglia density, organ of Corti integrity, or fibrosis and ossification at 12 weeks after implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The same group performed a study conducting physiological tests and histological examination after implanting the 2% dexamethasone loaded rods in guinea pigs in comparison to animals implanted with silicone rods without incorporated dexamethasone (55). Based on the data of the current study and total drug load of the rods used by Liu et al (55), it could be speculated that the rod loading used in their study led to perilymph drug concentrations between 50 and 100 ng/ml during the steady state phase (Figures 4A, 6). Implanted animals from both groups displayed an initial ABR threshold shift after implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study an inner ear dexamethasone steady state concentration of 0.1 μg/ml was achieved in the scala tympani (15,16). In another study using a similar dummy and EIT animal model a down regulation of TNF-a in cochlear tissue was shown in comparison to control group (17). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A variety of studies have shown that hearing loss induced by implant insertion trauma could be reduced with drugeluting materials placed during implantation, catheters for infusion, or drug-eluting devices themselves. [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] The efficacy and feasibility of such a drug-eluting system also has been demonstrated in humans. 62 Regardless of the method, corticosteroids reduce inflammatory processes caused by electrode insertion resulting in better preservation of cochlear structures, 63 and stabilization of hearing levels.…”
Section: Hearing Preservation In Cochlear Implantation: Surgical Techmentioning
confidence: 99%